"Rapid unscheduled disassembly"="It blowed up real good!"
While not nightmarish in the traditional sense, films that just use AI for AI's sake, as in the "This Town Ain't Seen Nothing Yet" 2-minute Google I/O intro film (look kids, a giant rubber duckie in the Old West - isn't that amazing!) probably won't get most folks excited about AI.
As far as evidence of AI coding efficacy goes, the NYT article cites a recent a paper by six economists - all but one current/former Microsoft Research employees - which concludes with findings that software engineers may find less than impressive: "Our preferred estimates from an instrumental variable regression suggest that usage of the coding assistant causes a 26.08% (SE: 10.3%) increase in the weekly number of completed tasks [economist-speak for weekly pull requests] for those using the tool. When we look at outcomes of secondary interest, our results support this interpretation, with a 13.55% (SE: 10.0%) increase in the number of code updates (commits) and a 38.38% (SE: 12.55%) increase in the number of times code was compiled. For Microsoft we observe both the developersâ(TM) tenure and their seniority as measured by job title. We find that Copilot significantly raises task completion for more recent hires and those in more junior positions but not for developers with longer tenure and in more senior positions." The Appendices include an email sent to study participants from Microsoft informing them that they were selected for the 'Copilot dogfood experiment' being conducted by the 'Office of Chief Economist.'
Meet your new AI co-worker, kids! My new hobby: watching AI slowly drive Microsoft employees insane
Never call a man a fool. Borrow from him.