Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - NYT: Inside DOGE's Chaotic Takeover of Social Security

theodp writes: In The Bureaucrat and the Billionaire: Inside DOGE’s Chaotic Takeover of Social Security, the New York Times begins: "Throughout the early months of this Trump presidency, Mr. Musk and his allies systematically built a false narrative of widespread fraud at the Social Security Administration based on misinterpreted data, using their claims to justify an aggressive effort to gain access to personal information on millions of Americans, a New York Times investigation has found. [...] At Social Security, Mr. Musk’s efforts amount to a case study in what happened when his team of government novices ran a critical government agency through misinformation and social media blasts. The Times’s investigation found that Mr. Musk became fixated on the program in early February after members of his team misread government spending data — a pivotal and previously unreported moment that DOGE believed had exposed massive fraud inside the agency." (Spoiler Alert: Things only go downhill from there.)

Submission + - Microsoft Spins $4M Dept. of Education Grant Into an Ad for Minecraft

theodp writes: If you believe Coding, Creativity and the New Digital Fluency — "sponsored content from Minecraft Education" published by EdSurge and penned by Laylah Bulman, a senior program manager at Minecraft Education — the way to a child's creative coding heart is through Microsoft Minecraft. "One example of creative coding comes from a curriculum that introduces computer science through game design and storytelling in Minecraft, a game-based learning platform used by millions of students worldwide," writes EdSurge. "Developed by Urban Arts in collaboration with Minecraft Education, the program offers middle school teachers professional development, ongoing coaching and a 72-session curriculum built around game-based instruction. Designed for grades 6-8, the project-based program is beginner-friendly; no prior programming experience is required for teachers or students. It blends storytelling, collaborative design and foundational programming skills with a focus on creativity and equity."

The Urban Arts and Microsoft Creative Coders program touted by EdSurge in its advertorial was funded by a $4 million Education Innovation and Research (EIR) grant that was awarded to Urban Arts in 2023 by the U.S. Dept. of Education "to create an engaging, game-based, middle school CS course using Minecraft tools" for 3,450 middle schoolers (6th-8th grades)" in New York and California (Urban Arts credited Minecraft for helping craft the winning proposal). A year prior, at the 2022 grand opening of the Microsoft Garage in New York City, Urban Arts alums pitched NYC Mayor Eric Adams on the idea that game development education can prepare public school students for the modern workplace as Microsoft President Brad Smith looked on. New York City is a Minecraft Education believer — the Mayor's Office of Media and Entertainment recently kicked off summer with the inaugural NYC Video Game Festival, which included the annual citywide Minecraft Education Battle of the Boroughs Esports Competition in partnership with NYC Public Schools.

Interestingly, the $4M in federal funding for Creative Coders — as well as $8M in earlier EIR grants awarded to Urban Arts for STEM education — may have been unlocked thanks to the efforts of Microsoft and Smith. In his 2019 book Tools and Weapons, Microsoft President Brad Smith indicated Microsoft made a $50 million K-12 CS education spending pledge to secure Ivanka Trump's assistance in persuading Donald Trump to sign a 2017 presidential order "to ensure that federal funding [$1 billion] from the Department of Education helps advance [K-12] computer science," including via EIR STEM+CS grants.

Submission + - EdSurge Touts Minecraft for 'Creative Coding' in Microsoft-Sponsored Advertorial

theodp writes: In Coding, Creativity and the New Digital Fluency ("sponsored content from Minecraft Education"), EdSurge reports: "One example of creative coding comes from a curriculum that introduces computer science through game design and storytelling in Minecraft, a game-based learning platform used by millions of students worldwide. Developed by Urban Arts in collaboration with Minecraft Education, the program offers middle school teachers professional development, ongoing coaching and a 72-session curriculum built around game-based instruction. Designed for grades 6-8, the project-based program is beginner-friendly; no prior programming experience is required for teachers or students. It blends storytelling, collaborative design and foundational programming skills with a focus on creativity and equity."

The Urban Arts and Microsoft Creative Coders program touted by EdSurge was awarded a $3,999,988 Education Innovation and Research (EIR) grant last year by the U.S. Dept. of Education "to create an engaging, game-based, middle school CS course using Minecraft tools" for 3,450 middle schoolers (6th-8th grades)." Interestingly, that federal funding may have been unlocked by Microsoft — in his 2019 book Tools and Weapons, Microsoft President Brad Smith credited a $50 million K-12 CS pledge made to Ivanka Trump by Microsoft as the key to getting Donald Trump to sign a 2017 presidential order "to ensure that federal funding [$1 billion over 5 years] from the Department of Education helps advance [K-12] computer science," including via EIR grants. At the 2022 grand opening of the Microsoft Garage in New York City, Urban Arts alums told Smith and NYC Mayor Eric Adams how game development education can prepare public school students for the modern workplace, a pitch that certainly seemed to work. Two weeks ago, the NYC Mayor’s Office of Media and Entertainment (MOME) kicked off summer with the inaugural NYC Video Game Festival (NYCVGF), which included the annual Minecraft Education Battle of the Boroughs Esports Competition in partnership with NYC Public Schools.

Submission + - New Code.org Curriculum Aims to Make Schoolkids Python-Literate and AI-Ready

theodp writes: The old Code.org curriculum page for middle and high school students has been changed to include a new Python Lab in the tech-backed nonprofit's K-12 offerings. Elsewhere on the site, a Computer Science and AI Foundations curriculum is described that includes units on 'Foundations of AI Programming [in Python]' and 'Insights from Data and AI [aka Data Science].' A more-detailed AI Foundations Syllabus 25-26 document promises a second semester of material is coming soon: "This semester offers an innovative approach to teaching programming by integrating learning with and about artificial intelligence (AI). Using Python as the primary language, students build foundational programming skills while leveraging AI tools to enhance computational thinking and problem-solving. The curriculum also introduces students to the basics of creating AI-powered programs, exploring machine learning, and applying data science principles."

Newly-posted videos on Code.org's YouTube channel appear to be intended to support the new Python-based CS & AI course. "Python is extremely versatile," explains a Walmart data scientist to open the video for Data Science: Using Python. "So, first of all, Python is one of the very few languages that can handle numbers very, very well." A researcher at the Univ. of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) adds, "Python is the gold standard and what people expect data scientists to know [...] Key to us being able to handle really big data sets is our use of Python and cluster computing." Adding to the Python love, an IHME data analyst explains, "Python is a great choice for large databases because there's a lot of support for Python libraries."

Code.org is currently recruiting teachers to attend its CS and AI Foundations Professional Learning program this summer, which is being taught by Code.org's national network of university and nonprofit regional partners (teachers who signup have a chance to win $250 in DonorsChoose credits for their classrooms). A flyer for a five-day Michigan Professional Development program to prepare teachers for a pilot of the Code.org CS & A course touts the new curriculum as "an alternative to the AP [Computer Science] pathway" (teachers are offered scholarships covering registration, lodging, meals, & workshop materials).

Interestingly, Code.org's embrace of Python and Data Science comes as the nonprofit changes its mission to 'make CS and AI a core part of K-12 education' and launches a new national campaign with tech leaders to make CS and AI a graduation requirement. Prior to AI changing the education conversation, Code.org in 2021 boasted that it had lined up a consortium of tech giants, politicians, and educators to push its new $15 million Amazon-bankrolled Java AP CS A curriculum into K-12 classrooms. Just three years later, however, Amazon CEO Andy Jassy was boasting to investors that Amazon had turned to AI to automatically do Java coding that he claimed would have otherwise taken human coders 4,500 developer-years to complete.

Submission + - "King of the Hill" Returns to TV After 15 Years

theodp writes: Hulu has released the first-look at the "King of the Hill" revival, marking the show's return to TV after 15 years. The 14th season of the animated series will debut on Aug. 4. Returning as an actor and executive producer is original series co-creator Mike Judge, whose past work has included TV and movie faves Silicon Valley, Idiocracy, Office Space, and Beavis and Butt-Head.

The setup: "After years working a propane job in Saudi Arabia to earn their retirement nest egg, Hank and Peggy Hill return to a changed Arlen, Texas to reconnect with old friends Dale, Boomhauer and Bill. Meanwhile, Bobby is living his dream as a chef in Dallas and enjoying his 20s with his former classmates Connie, Joseph and Chane."

Submission + - Code.org Changes Mission to "Make CS and AI a Core Part of K–12 Education"

theodp writes: Way back in 2010, Microsoft and Google teamed with nonprofit partners to launch Computing in the Core, an advocacy coalition whose mission was "to strengthen computing education and ensure that it is a core subject for students in the 21st century." In 2013, Computing in the Core was merged into Code.org, a new tech-backed-and-directed nonprofit. And in 2015, Code.org declared 'Mission Accomplished' with the passage of the Every Student Succeeds Act, which elevated computer science to a core academic subject for grades K-12.

Fast forward to June 2025 and Code.org has changed its About page to reflect a new AI mission that's near-and-dear to the hearts of Code.org's tech giant donors and tech leader Board members: "Code.org® is a nonprofit working to make computer science (CS) and artificial intelligence (AI) a core part of K–12 education for every student." The mission change comes as tech companies are looking to chop headcount amid the AI boom and just weeks after tech CEOs and leaders launched a new Code.org-orchestrated national campaign to make CS and AI a graduation requirement.

Comment AI-for-AI's-Sake a Different Kind of Nightmare? (Score 2) 74

While not nightmarish in the traditional sense, films that just use AI for AI's sake, as in the "This Town Ain't Seen Nothing Yet" 2-minute Google I/O intro film (look kids, a giant rubber duckie in the Old West - isn't that amazing!) probably won't get most folks excited about AI.

Comment Evidence of AI Coding Efficacy (Score 1) 101

As far as evidence of AI coding efficacy goes, the NYT article cites a recent a paper by six economists - all but one current/former Microsoft Research employees - which concludes with findings that software engineers may find less than impressive: "Our preferred estimates from an instrumental variable regression suggest that usage of the coding assistant causes a 26.08% (SE: 10.3%) increase in the weekly number of completed tasks [economist-speak for weekly pull requests] for those using the tool. When we look at outcomes of secondary interest, our results support this interpretation, with a 13.55% (SE: 10.0%) increase in the number of code updates (commits) and a 38.38% (SE: 12.55%) increase in the number of times code was compiled. For Microsoft we observe both the developersâ(TM) tenure and their seniority as measured by job title. We find that Copilot significantly raises task completion for more recent hires and those in more junior positions but not for developers with longer tenure and in more senior positions." The Appendices include an email sent to study participants from Microsoft informing them that they were selected for the 'Copilot dogfood experiment' being conducted by the 'Office of Chief Economist.'

Submission + - Does AI Use in Anthropic's "A Day With Claude" Video Excite or Depress You?

theodp writes: Watch the use cases in Anthropic's new A Day With Claude promotional video (so, was AI used to 'create' that title?) and you may be disheartened about the AI future as painted by Anthropic, which is backed by billions from Google and Amazon. The video features a researcher whose day is planned by Claude and whose education research is delegated to AI, a product manager who vibe codes a 'working prototype' of a generic coffee ordering app for a tech conference, and a technical staffer who boasts of using Claude AI to effortlessly 'turn my docs into actionable work for the rest of the team.' Some YouTube commenters were less-than-impressed, including @rayallinkh, who asks: "Is there a reason why the 3 of you here are still employed?"

On "Vibe Coding", on the other hand, offers a be-careful-what-you-wish-for warning about GenAI coding tools (even ones that don't try to blackmail you). From the post: "But does vibe coding give organizations and individuals power? Power to build what they need regardless of their wealth? Sure, if "build what you need" means "something that might look like a thing that might do what you need but there are no guarantees". If I have a rich person who can hire professionals to write their code and a poor person that I give access to a code generator those two people get wildly different results: One person actually gets a maintainable piece of software based on their requirements and all the guarantees that one wants when running something relevant. The other person gets something that they have no idea what it does and where/how it might fail. This is not empowerment, this is cynicism. It’s the same logic of giving people who have no access to psychotherapy a chatbot. That’s not the same, it only looks like it from space.

Submission + - The Information: Microsoft Engineers Forced to Dig Their Own AI Graves

theodp writes: In what reads a bit like a Sopranos plot, The Information suggests some of those in the recent batch of terminated Microsoft engineers may have in effect been forced to dig their own AI graves.

The (paywalled) story begins: "Jeff Hulse, a Microsoft vice president who oversees roughly 400 software engineers, told the team in recent months to use the company's artificial intelligence chatbot, powered by OpenAI, to generate half the computer code they write, according to a person who heard the remarks. That would represent an increase from the 20% to 30% of code AI currently produces at the company, and shows how rapidly Microsoft is moving to incorporate such technology. Then on Tuesday, Microsoft laid off more than a dozen engineers on Hulse 's team as part of a broader layoff of 6,000 people across the company that appeared to hit engineers harder than other types of roles, this person said."

The report comes as tech company CEOs have taken to boasting in earnings calls, tech conferences, and public statements that their AI is responsible for an ever-increasing share of the code written at their organizations. Microsoft's recent job cuts hit coders the hardest. So how much credence should one place on CEOs' claims of AI programming productivity gains — which researchers have struggled to measure for 50+ years — if engineers are forced to increase their use of AI, boosting the numbers their far-removed-from-programming CEOs are presenting to Wall Street?

Submission + - Are Tech Giants Cooking Their AI Coding Productivity Books?

theodp writes: In earnings calls, tech conferences, and public statements, tech CEOs have lately taken to singing the praises of eating their companies' AI dogfood, suggesting that their AI is so good and responsible for so much of the productivity at their organizations that it's forced them to rid their workforce of software engineers who have now been rendered unnecessary by AI. It's a powerful pitch, no doubt, but people have struggled to measure programming productivity for 50+ years, so one would be advised to take the claims with a grain of salt, especially coming from the mouths of tech CEOs who are far removed from programming.

Now, The Information reports that some of those in the recent batch of terminated Microsoft engineers may have in effect been ordered to dig their own AI graves. The (paywalled) story begins: "Jeff Hulse, a Microsoft vice president who oversees roughly 400 software engineers, told the team in recent months to use the company’s artificial intelligence chatbot, powered by OpenAI, to generate half the computer code they write, according to a person who heard the remarks. That would represent an increase from the 20% to 30% of code AI currently produces at the company, and shows how rapidly Microsoft is moving to incorporate such technology. Then on Tuesday, Microsoft laid off more than a dozen engineers on Hulse’s team as part of a broader layoff of 6,000 people across the company that appeared to hit engineers harder than other types of roles, this person said."

Submission + - OpenAI and Microsoft Go to Washington

theodp writes: On Thursday, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Microsoft President Brad Smith were joined by partners AMD and CoreWeave as they testified before the Senate Commerce Committee on 'Winning the AI Race', which was described as a two-horse race between the US and China (hearing transcript).

So, what's needed? According to Microsoft's Smith, faster permitting of AI datacenters (as well as more electricity and more electricians to bring them to life), government and private sector R&D spending, open access to government data for use in AI training, adoption of AI by the government and throughout society, skilling the American workforce (including funding of K-12 AI learning and literacy), and fewer constraints on exporting AI technology.

So, is what's good for AI tech companies good for the USA?

Slashdot Top Deals

Never call a man a fool. Borrow from him.

Working...