ah I remember my first computer... sinclair zx81... 1K of ram... and then I bought the 16K RAM expander module and killed that....
Babies are delicious, especially when they are yours. I find myself kissing him all the time thinking of how delicious he is. So, i started telling people: I'm not kissing my son, i'm holding back from eating him.
Congrats to you as well!
Oh me, oh my. I'm old and just getting older. But this year i got the best birthday present ever. My son was born just a couple days ago. I can't wait to take him home from the NICU.
Nice idea.
If you pinch "imply" hard enough you can make it mean "infer"
That statement itself is enough to pinch all the linguists out there.
What makes that the "correct" version? It seems the line has quite the history and has taken on many forms. Fwiw, Wikipedia justifies "implies".
I ought to be jealous of you. But i'm much too lazy.
I just read a comment: "Correlation does not connote causation." A search found the more common adage uses "imply" instead of "connote". Though, they are somewhat synonymous.
Anyway, that seems wrong. I mean, the whole point is that it does indeed imply causation. That's why we need to remind people that it does not equal causation.
That's a reasonable analogy. Both cases are driven by external factors (mathematics for IPv4, atmospheric chemistry for gas-powered cars), and the authorities are doing a fairly poor job of solving the collective action problem.
Everybody *wants* to stuff a trillion numbers into 32 bits, and stuff infinite carbon into the air, but reality doesn't care what we want.
Suppose you have a PC on an internal IPv4 network, connected to an IPv6 edge router. You type "ipv6.google.com" into your browser. What address should it connect to?
over the deep face of the depths.
"deep" fits neither the words nor the context.
"depths" It says water, not depths.
That does not compute.
