https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftech.yahoo.com%2Fai%2Farti...
""Gross oversimplification, but like older people use ChatGPT as a Google replacement. Maybe people in their 20s and 30s use it as like a life advisor, and then, like people in college use it as an operating system," Altman said at Sequoia Capital's AI Ascent event earlier this month."
Not a surprise then that a lot of Slashdotters (who tend to be on the older side) emphasize search engine use.
Insightful video on other options for using AI:
"Most of Us Are Using AI Backwards -- Here's Why"
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3F...
"Takeaways
1. Compression Trap: We default to using AI to shrink information--summaries, bullet points, stakeholder briefs--missing opportunities for deeper insight.
2. Optimize Brain Time: The real question isn't "How fast can I read?" but "When should I slow down and let ideas ferment?" AI can be tuned to extend, not shorten, our cognitive dwell-time on critical topics.
3. Conversational Partnership: Advanced voice mode's give-and-take cadence keeps ideas flowing, acting like a patient therapist and sharp colleague rolled into one.
4. Multi-Model Workflow: I pair models deliberately--4o voice for live riffing, O3 for distilling a thesis, Opus 4 for conceptual sculpting--to match each cognitive phase.
5. Naming the Work: Speaking thoughts aloud while an AI listens helps "name" the terrain of a project, turning vague hunches into navigable coordinates.
6. AI as Expander: Used thoughtfully, AI doesn't replace brainpower; it amplifies it, transforming routine tooling into a force-multiplier for deep thinking."
Other interesting AI Videos:
"Godfather of AI: I Tried to Warn Them, But We've Already Lost Control! Geoffrey Hinton"
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3F...
"Is AI Apocalypse Inevitable? - Tristan Harris"
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3F...
See also an essay by Maggie Appleton: "The Dark Forest and Generative AI: Proving you're a human on a web flooded with generative AI content"
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmaggieappleton.com%2Fai-...
Talk & video version: "The Expanding Dark Forest and Generative AI: An exploration of the problems and possible futures of flooding the web with generative AI content"
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmaggieappleton.com%2Ffor...
On what Star Trek in the 1960s had to say about AI and becoming "Captain Dunsel" and also the risk of AI reflecting its obsessive & flawed creators,:
"The Ultimate Computer // Star Trek: The Original Series Reaction // Season 2"
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3F...
An insightful Substack post (which I replied to) on that theme of flawed creators making a flawed creation, mentioning the story of the Krell from Forbidden Planet:
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2F%40bernsh%2Fn...
"In Forbidden Planet the Krell built a machine of unimaginable power, designed to materialize thought itself -- but were ultimately destroyed because it also materialized their unconscious, primitive, destructive impulses, which they themselves did not fully understand or control. ..."
They also mention other stories there (perhaps generated from an LLM), including The Garden of Eden, Pandoraâ(TM)s Box, The Tower of Babel, The Icarus Myth, and Prometheus. I my response I mentioned some other sci-fi stories that touch on related themes for that and my sig on the irony of tools of abundance misused by scarcity-minded people.
Inspired by that first video on using AI to help refine ideas, a few days ago I used llama3.1 to discuss an essay I wrote related to my sig ( "Recognizing irony is key to transcending militarism" https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpdfernhout.net%2Frecogni... ). The most surprisingly useful part was when I asked the LLM to list authors who had written related things (most of whom I knew of), and then, as a follow-up, what those authors might have thought about the essay I wrote. The LLM included for each author what parts of the essay they would have praised and also what was missing from the essay from that author's perspective.