Likewise if other cloud providers can offer similar services so it's not just about these two. It might sound unthinkable today, but then so was a cloud-to-cloud link just a few years ago.
Connectivity with Azure is announced for 2026.
then you're going to hate multi-cloud.
"The fact that people are unimpressed that we can have a fluent conversation with a super smart AI that can generate any image/video is mindblowing to me,"
Mindblowing is that companies make all the claims about AI that are 100% unfounded. "generate any image/video"... No it can't. "fluent conversation"... Unless I have to constantly remind it about the thing it said two prompts ago that it forgot. And I PAY for AI access.
It's not anywhere near impressive. It's a party trick at best and dangerously misleading at worst.
Not in the UK. Our last coal power plant shut down last year (Ratcliffe-on-soar) and demolition work starts in June next year.
What brought the Iberian electrical grid down wasn't I2R losses but unconstrained variations in frequency. Once the Iberian and French grids got too far out of sync that connection was dropped and failures kind of cascaded from there. Or something to that effect.
Those interconnects are HVDC. There is no "sync".
Frequency change is a symptom, not a cause. The cause was a lack of control over reactive power which then caused voltage instability.
Try reading - https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Faelec.es%2Fwp-content%2Fup..., https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lamoncloa.gob.es%2Fc... (try google translate if your spanish isn't up to scratch), and https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fd1n1o4zeyfu21r.cloudfr...
If Starlink is anything to go by (and Kuiper satellites are at similar altitudes) you’re looking at 25-50ms. My Starlink experience was over 18 months ago and there are are lot more satellites up than there were then so it might be more consistent.
Surely if the same principle applies - why would Ofcom care what a US court decides?
The drive to the bottom line (see what I did there?) is a slippery slope. A good CEO will balance profitability with employee satisfaction. Why? Because a company's employees should be their best customers. If you have "half" as many customers right out of the gate, the company is going to do worse as a result. People who talk about AI eliminating jobs forget that their business model relies on a base of customers willing to spend their money on the product. If people are out of work, they aren't going to buy a shiny new car.
MCP may very well stand for "Model Context Protocol", but in the 1980's it stood for the villain of the Tron series, Master Control Program. Will tying AI together be a good thing or will we see the rise of another kind of MCP?
An interesting idea. Cross-signing sort of achieves this.
How would certificate revocation work with multiple signers? If one signer said the certificate was revoked, but the other said it wasn't, which would you trust?
Char coal, yes. Mined coal isn't that ancient.
.. and at 2,950 kilograms, someone doesn't know how much a 2023 Rolls-Royce Spectre weighs.
Your assumption is wrong. Gender can be known and it is still fine to use "their" as a pronoun.
From A Comedy Of Errors, Shakespeare, first published in 1623 - Act 4 Scene 3:
There’s not a man I meet but doth salute me
As if I were their well-acquainted friend,
So feel free to claim that I'm encouraging "pronoun dog whistle games". I don't care. You are wrong, and your foghorn of false indignation is far louder.
Quantity is no substitute for quality, but its the only one we've got.
