You joke but this is actually where Microsoft is going.
I remember back in 2005-ish there was an ashcan mag published by former Microsoft employees you could subscribe to for ~$50/year that contained internal memos, emails, etc. and one of the big email threads that was kicked around back then is that Microsoft's future game was to get out of selling Windows as a software product and turn their OS platform into a software-as-a-service model where your hardware would only have a RTOS-based microkernel and the OS would be streamed to you on demand much like the Terminal Services model.
The backend services for that model were meant to run on Linux servers. The end game objective of moving into supporting Linux and contributing code to open source projects is for Microsoft to take over the open source community as a whole by first contributing code, then becoming an asset to the community, then financing development of open source projects. Then when the open source projects can no longer function without Microsoft's funding they would enact a hostile takeover of the open source community by withholding financing unless the community bends to Microsoft's whims.
It's very much a "if you can't beat them with a better product, infiltrate and wreck their shit" scenario.