Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Not news (Score 2, Insightful) 64

Yes and no. The news is that the real results measured right now are at the upper level of the estimates, which means that reality is worse than the science popularizations have suggested so far - and they were already called alarmist, when in fact, they were understating the problem.

Comment Re:maliciously abused (Score 2) 31

Just to play devil's advocate, those security professionals are being a bit disingenuous every time they make that claim. There is no backdoor into cryptocurrency's encryption and coins still manage to be stolen. Encrypted security is only as strong as the care taken to safeguard the private key, and as crypto "heists" have proven, it is entirely possible to gain access to something you shouldn't without actually compromising the encryption itself.

This is not playing devil's advocate, this is whataboutism. Even more so, it proves the point of the security professionals. If we can't even make something designed not to have backdoors safe enough to prevent unauthorized access, how much more insecure is something which should be designed to have an obvious and an obscure access? Now we have to fight off even more attack vectors, and apparently, we aren't perfect in it.

Comment Re:I get it. (Score 1) 70

And you have to keep test systems around based on the different chipsets. The list can be expanded: timing is different on different processor architectures. Memory management is different. Interrupt control is different. The number and the layout of differently privileged modes is different. That means that syscalls have to be implemented differently. And this does not in the slightest exhausts the list of 486 quirks and features (and that of every other chip architecture).

Comment Re:I get it. (Score 5, Insightful) 70

A lot. You have to run every test suite for 486. You have to keep a working 486 around for testing. You have bugs to iron out that only appear in 486. You have to run code that's only there because it in software emulates behavior other processors have in hardware. You have to make sure this does not have side effects which don't even appear in other architectures etc.pp..

Comment Re:Yeah, right. (Score 3, Insightful) 114

Jimmy Carter left office in 1981. Who still uses him as an explanation is about 40 years late.

Main problem with nuclear power - independent of country - it is fricking expensive to build and not easy to operate. France is often cited as the example how you power a country with nuclear. But France's nuclear power plants, despite in operation since 60 years, never turned a profit. The taxpayer in France pays for the cheap electricity prices. (And compared to Austrian prices, where I live, France's electricity is not cheap either. We pay about the same, but Austria never had a single nuclear reactor running.) Hinkley Point C in Great Britain will never turn a profit either. Instead, the taxpayer will warrant the electricity price for Hinkley Point C, and it is more expensive than what I pay per kWh to my utility (Innsbrucker Kommunalbetriebe, if you want to look up energy prices. It's 12 ct/kWh).

And then there is the argument with base load - despite the very same argument being one of the reasons that energy in Germany is so expensive. Base load means, you can't switch it off when cheaper energy is available. In Germany, wind turbines are stopped, and cheap energy goes to waste, because expensive coal plants are not easily powered down. The same problem Germany had with nuclear by the way. Today, biogas provides the same amount of electric power in Germany as nuclear had when it was still running. Problem: most biogas plants in Germany are also base load, despite it being able to power easily switchable gas turbines. If Germany manages to get away from the base load idea and switches to a type of power generation that can be powered on and off within minutes, energy prices will drop.

Slashdot Top Deals

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke

Working...