Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment You can't prevent forest fires. (Score 1) 11

When you stop every little possible cause of fires you're not preventing them. You're delaying them and making them much larger when they do happen such that they cause all their problems at once; are harder to control fight and manage; and are more likely to burn into areas that otherwise wouldn't burn.

Comment Re:Modern Feudalism incoming (Score 0) 86

Feudalism is already here. Oligarchs enrich themselves by creating paywalls from chaos. The citizenry pay for things that were less expensive under true capitalist competition. Oligarchs use their wealth to dismantle rules, regulations, safety requirements, and oversight (aka neo-liberal deregulation) it break unions, pay remaining workers less money, monopolize and increase costs, buy up competition or smash startups with legal harassment, leaving us with shitty more expensive things that don't work and no recourse. We don't own anything anymore. We are only allowed to rent things protecting the oligarchs with one sided ELU's and no rights to fix something that breaks. This has been true for a couple of decades now, Trump and reichwing are just blatant about it.

Submission + - Bombshell report exposes how Meta relied on scam ad profits to fund AI (arstechnica.com)

schwit1 writes: Documents showed that internally, Meta was hesitant to abruptly remove accounts, even those considered some of the “scammiest scammers,” out of concern that a drop in revenue could diminish resources needed for artificial intelligence growth.

Instead of promptly removing bad actors, Meta allowed “high value accounts” to “accrue more than 500 strikes without Meta shutting them down,” Reuters reported. The more strikes a bad actor accrued, the more Meta could charge to run ads, as Meta’s documents showed the company “penalized” scammers by charging higher ad rates. Meanwhile, Meta acknowledged in documents that its systems helped scammers target users most likely to click on their ads.

“Users who click on scam ads are likely to see more of them because of Meta’s ad-personalization system, which tries to deliver ads based on a user’s interests,” Reuters reported.

Internally, Meta estimates that users across its apps in total encounter 15 billion “high risk” scam ads a day. That’s on top of 22 billion organic scam attempts that Meta users are exposed to daily, a 2024 document showed. Last year, the company projected that about $16 billion, which represents about 10 percent of its revenue, would come from scam ads.

Comment Re:lol no. (Score 2) 59

I don't need to worry about that sort of thing.

It is very good to be certain, and worry free. You have achieved what few have.

My wife has showed me nothing but kindness, i wouldn't want to be married to anyone stupid enough to risk our marriage on a tiktok test anyhow.

I'm not certain, but your tone indicates I might have touched a nerve here. Of course you or I would not want to be married to someone who would risk their marriage over those stupid tests. But those tests do exist. We have to pay attention though. There are stressors, such as boredom, insecurity, peer pressure, and its close cousin group dynamics.

While my wife doesn't use TikTok, I can observe changes in her gestalt after joining Facebook some years ago. She's a stable person, but being in contact with my toxic older sister on a now daily basis has had some observable effect.

note: this is not specifically about women. I have a friend who was radicalized by Facebook's algorithms. I suspect from your pseudonym, you might be familiar with them. First click on some random political news or even news channel, then more and more extreme pages start showing up on your feed, the algorithm chooses based on your clicks, then nudges you along. But this friend shifted from mildly conservative to full blown MAGA at the far edge of the spectrum over a couple years.

But back to my SO. Despite my suggestions that too much contact with my sister might not be all that great, there have been undeniable signs that indicate they have been in regular communications. Both by social media, and personal communications. Not much I can do about that, SO is her own person.

Point is, the wife is pretty stable, has decent critical thinking skills, and yet still influenceable by social media. To a lesser extent, definitely, but the principle holds.

Perhaps your SO is immune. I hope so - a kind woman is a gift. I only do my regular me doing me as a Cassandra. But it is always a few clicks away from a deep dive into the algorithm and where it takes you, and how it influences you.

Regardless, good luck.

Comment Re:Not at all creepy (Score 1) 131

In reality you can be fine in either a home school or public school environment. Or, either one of them can really mess you up. I know a few kids who graduated early from high school (some doing home school, one going straight for the GED two years early), so they could escape from public school and enter the much more healthy environment of university life.

Submission + - Musk Wins $1 Trillion Pay Package, Creating Split Screen on Wealth in America (nytimes.com)

schwit1 writes: Tesla shareholders approved a plan to grant Elon Musk shares worth nearly $1 trillion if he meets ambitious goals, including vastly expanding the company’s stock market valuation.

Much like an earlier pay plan that Tesla shareholders approved in 2018, this 12-step package asks Mr. Musk, the company’s chief executive, to vastly expand Tesla’s stock market valuation — to $8.5 trillion from around $1.4 trillion — while hitting a variety of other goals. Those include selling one million robots with humanlike qualities and 10 million paid subscriptions to the company’s self-driving software.

Slashdot Top Deals

The best things in life are for a fee.

Working...