If I'm not mistaken it's technically his sons' business. They're just trading on the overall Trump name.

Which is exactly what they lost their mind over Biden doing, but in fact could never prove it.

The word "homoPHOBIC" used to throw me too, until I realized, for example, hydrophobic materials aren't AFRAID of water, they resist or repel it.

Homophobic people aren't afraid of gay people, they resist or repel them.

That's much more robust than an Excel spreadsheet.

One way to correct this imbalance is to have an agency that works on the side of Consumers, investigating the Financial industry, giving us Protection from these corporate crimes. A Bureau if you will.

Well, we had that. Now Trump is eliminating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

We'll never make progress against this corporate power imbalance if people keep voting against their own interests.

No the administration is withdrawing hundreds of millions in food and medicine aid and hiding behind stories like this where a few US government employees were found to have accounts in this system they probably paid a few hundred dollars a year to join. Trade associations are funded by corporations and invite government and NGO members pay nominal fees to be "associate members."

That's like saying Walmart is funded by the US government because the folks at the post office buy office birthday cakes there.

It was *not* paid for by the US government, it was paid for by agribusiness corporations. A few US government employees had accounts in the system which probably amounted to as little as a few hundred dollars a year.

By living a full and happy life well into their thirties.

"Ads don't work on me" is my favorite I'm-14-and-this-is-smart flex.

Hi. You can see and hear? Ads work on you.

If you were creating value in the world, leaks would amplify that because others could do the same. Equating shareholder value with value in the world is just gaslighting.

Shit got expensive too. Much better for them if there's no rules on who can say what.

> he knows how to talk to working-class Americans without insulting them.

By repeating lies about stolen elections and eating pets, instead of talking about policies to improve the nation?

He's an insult to thinking-class Americans.

You make a good argument for more political parties, not against social media competition.

A monthly fee for Netflix or Spotify makes sense -- you're renting a library far larger than you could hope to purchase outright.

A monthly fee to provide a feature or two for a product you've paid $1700 for is absurd.

People need to recognize the difference because subscriptions aren't going away, just sometimes they make sense and sometimes they're nothing but money grabs.

That's... what the post said. What's implausible about it and how does it differ from what you said?

How come medical researchers "use AI" but programmers are "replaced by AI?"