The paper shows a somewhat convoluted comparison of the various algorithms running against one dataset relative to FIFO. Why didn't they publish comparisons with the other data sets? And what does "10% of the traces" mean?

Why don't they compare SIEVE to the fastest of the other algorithms directly?

And what does their throughput number actually mean? Is it "objects checked?"

The NLRB will be smacked down, just like in the Starbucks case.

RCS enables rich text messages, which to google means you can use them for ads.

Why would anyone besides google and the carriers want this?

It was so successful that google disabled RCS in India due to spam:

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.indiatoday.in%2Ftech...

People always credit parental involvement for kids' school performance.

While it's important, it's also true that at the high end of the income scale parents are just as absent as parents at the low end.

The fact is that their school performance is better because they actually measure performance...unlike most union-driven public schools, where measuring performance leads to the slippery slope of judging teachers by student performance.

RCS enables rich-text ads OTA, which is why Google wants Apple to enable it.

Everyone in the industry knows Apple users are worth more, and Google can charge more for ads via RCS if it could deliver them. Without Apple's support that'll never happen.

Thank you Apple, for holding the line on this.

This is probably the worst idea when it comes to laundering money.

I mean, why not set up a chaturbate/onlyfans account instead? You'd make more money more quickly.

This doesn't mean that Apple's chips won't be ready. It might mean that they won't be able to make enough of them.

Using terrorists and fear in your funding appeals isn't really a winning formula. I'm sure the lack of "events" is used as a measure of how successful the act is. But - before 2007 were there any cases of terrorists accessing these facilities? From what I understand the vast majority of terrorists have bought their ANFO and box cutters retail.

You know what else these kids had in common? Bad parenting. Let's go fix the root cause instead of trying to remove rights from law-abiding citizens.

Given how many people have been ingesting aspartame and the length of time that most people ingest aspartame, if there was a meaningful cancer risk the signal for it would be really high. The WHO found weak signals in a few studies. At that point who cares.

The crater didn't confuse its software.

The altitude measured by the instruments didn't match the altitude used by the lander's onboard maps. It then determined that the instruments were faulty, and used the onboard map data.

Unfortunately, the onboard map was for the previous landing site.

There was no confusion, just bad data due to a poor process.

Who comes up with these shit summaries?

If you actually read the article, you'd see that they weren't able to get control with ASLR turned on, which is it by default.

This is another bullshit article by a security firm trying to get business.

If raccoon dogs are the source, where is the wild reservoir? It shouldn't be that hard to find.

Oh, they haven't found it yet? Hmm.

Google has been pretty irrelevant for almost a decade now. Most of their new products have been shit. The only products that work are the ones they bought long ago and most of those are coasting on momentum.

It just goes to show, money hides all the flaws.

Imprisoning and re-educating executives also harms business confidence, which is why they are starting to leave China.