This will ultimately be the downfall of Wikipedia as many of the top admins are retiring because they didn't recruit fresh talent.
Encyclopedias can just get complete. There are only so many topics that truly belong there, and there's only so much polish to do. So eventually you end up with people editing mostly articles about the recent/current events, and these are often controversial.
When the active hostility is gone, the enrollment will increase again.
German universities were once the world leaders in physics research and social sciences. Then the Nazis happened, and the German university system never recovered.
Building a nuclear reactor takes so long simply from a construction standpoint Trump will be out of office and we can reverse all this before the U.S. has its own Chernobyl.
The worst that can happen with modern nuclear reactors is Three-Mile Island: no casualties, at most minor radiation leaks, all the fuel contained within the designated structure.
When I lived in Britain I could walk to work. Literally, 3 minute commute.
A good way to flaunt your privilege, dude. Most people in London spend around 40 minutes to get to work. Of course, you might have lived in a small city.
That freedom is not available to the average American. Everyone has to drive, even those who can't afford to.
This freedom IS available for an average American.
Cars: they make the city so wildly unpleasant that even down and outs won't go there.
Car-oriented cities are indeed unpleasant when all you want is to drink/drug all day.
Contrary to your opinion, I would say Seattle and Vancouver, BC greatly improved over the last 10 years.
If you're a real estate developer, interested in despoiling the city and then fucking off to your lake-side mansion in Nevada.
Otherwise? It's worse in every regard: crime, housing prices, commute times, homelessness, public drug use, student achievements, quality of infrastructure, etc.
Odd, because bikes are everywhere in Vancouver nowadays. Especially with e-bikes, lots of people are commuting to work by bike. Heck, many offices now have showers available for people who ride.
And there is not a single car in Vancouver, right?
The statistics are pretty clear. The percentage of bike trips in Vancouver has been stagnant around 8% for quite a while. Their 2040 target is a whopping 12%.
I doubt that. It's probably a case of bad statistics with a misaligned way to count
Feel free to fire a FOIA request, it's free. And no, there's nothing misaligned. It's the data from bike counters they put on bike lanes. And it's no wonder, Seattle is very hilly and biking in the rain and cold (i.e. most of the year) is not fun at all.
And I initially started suspecting that something is not right when I had to commute every day through a congested street, with literally _nobody_ passing me in the bike lane. That made the street congested in the first place.
First, bicycles use less space than a car, and a bike lane can be much narrower than a car.
A typical bike lane in Seattle removes a whole car lane, and sometimes _two_ lanes.
I want my city to be liveable for people, not a playground for car bros
In the US, the people _are_ car-bros and car-girls. And it absolutely helped the US to become the leading economy. Car ownership unlocked the golden era of the US, and pivoting to urbanism (and its increasing misery) led to the never-ending downfall.
First off, there's lots of bikes that can fit more than one person, albeit not five.
I'm sorry, I spilled my tea. Have you SEEN Seattle bike riders? I don't think I have ever seen a double bike here. I've seen riders with children, but only a few times.
When you adopt silly positions like this, you just sound like so...rigid.
And yet, you don't have any objections that are not based on feelings?
"One day I woke up and discovered that I was in love with tripe." -- Tom Anderson