Seconded. I have a Vaio Pro 11, and there still isn't anything as light and powerful out there. Core i7, 8Gb ram and after I upgraded the SSD, 512Gb storage. In less than 2 pounds. Fantastic.

There were WAY fewer programmers back in the 80's than now. I'm willing to bet the number of software developers have grown exponentially over the years, which means that there simply aren't that many older programmers (compared to the number of younger ones). I honestly think that's a big part of it.

Also, I definitely know some older developers, usually they're some sort of senior architects or other, with incredible expertise within one or two products. They definitely exist, there just aren't that many.

Definitely.

It also seems heavily tilted towards web development. There are no options that fit "firmware", "embedded", "device software", "OS", or anything else that fits my skill-set.

As has been pointed out, Google is an advertising company cubed and won't do this unless they're forced to. But Mozilla and Firefox (and it's descendants) could, and I hope they will. All the more reason to switch (back) to Firefox.

Seconded - I've used Sonic for about 12 years - couldn't be happier. They've also gotten the big thumbs up from EFF for their privacy practices.

When I switched my service to DSL2 (should give up to 20Mb / second down) some years ago, they sent a technician to my place. He found that even though the building was close enough to their CO, the old copper wiring in the building meant I wouldn't be able to use the full 20Mb. So instead they suggested a cheaper and slower plan. I gotta say, an ISP who sends out a guy who explains they will take less money from me is pretty rare.

So, my connection is on paper fairly slow - 6Mbit down and 1 up. But on the other hand, I actually get that speed. It's enough to watch Netflix in HD. If I'm downloading something large (say, a linux image) I see my DL speed top out at about 650Kb/second, which means I am getting the whole 6 MBit. Day or night. (And again, that 6Mbit is because of my building, not because of Sonic!).

Always always check if you can get Sonic where you live.

It's an honest question. I am a programmer of embedded systems and microcontrollers, my expertise is at the other end of the computing spectrum.

As much as I like to blame Oracle, the state may have added serious requirements at the last minute that complicated everything. These articles doesn't say anything about it. Same seems to go for all the troubled exchanges - so what's the problem?

Is there anyone on here with some insight?

From TFA:

Samsung used to license these patents, then stopped paying. They knew a lawsuit was coming, and decided it was a fight worth taking. I have no clue whether the fees requested by Ericsson are unreasonable or not - but there's no need for conspiracy theories or ulterior motives on this one.

Ericsson no longer makes phones. They're a highly profitable company building cell phone networks with lots of patents in the wireless tech-sphere. Samsung and Ericsson are not, in other words, direct competitors and this is not a case of competing through the courts. Key part from TFA:

"The suits were filed because Ericsson said it could not reach a license agreement for its patents with Samsung on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms after two years of negotiations. Samsung was asked to pay the same rate as its competitors, but Samsung refused, according to Ericsson.

"Samsung had licensed Ericsson patents before. However, according to a statement released by Samsung last week, Ericsson demanded 'significantly higher royalty rates for the same patent portfolio,' adding that it planned to 'take all necessary legal measures to protect against Ericsson's excessive claims.'"

This is purely about the money. The two companies stopped negotiating, Samsung is betting that going to court (they must have known a lawsuit was coming) will end up better for them than paying Ericsson's fee.