Watching a solid block of aluminium. Now that's time well spent. Kids today and their TV sets.

On the topic of strange Slashdot behaviour. Can anyone explain why Slashdot comments often look like this? This is with Firefox 3.0.11 in Ubuntu.

That certainly is a problem. A brute force solution to that problem is to make sure the network has enough "non-government" nodes to drive down the probability figures in such analyses. I guess if the probability of identifying an end node is low enough, that also makes it less likely for the government to seek warrants. (Unless they are just trying to bring down all nodes of the network.)
The I2P website has a list of different threat models and links to related papers. I guess this one falls under partitioning attacks.

I'm not sure I'm qualified but, in loose wording. The entity running N nodes should not know how long the bounce length is. In that way it cannot determine if the nodes it is talking to are endpoints or just routing nodes. Also, since the data is encrypted, the entity cannot read it in transit.

The real question is whether it runs X11 like the Nokia 770/N800/N810, allowing it to run unmodified desktop apps.

From a glance, it looks like drawing is done via directfb.

There was a question about this on the Axum forum, where Niklas elaborates some about the inspirations for Axum.

It had been a wonderful evening and what I needed now, to give it the perfect ending, was a little of the Non-Van.

Sounds interesting, can you link to a good source with more info?

They have more members than the green party , which HAS seats in parliament.

Looking at the pirate partys web page, they clearly state (on the first page) that they have roughly half the number of members as the green party. Furthermore, the green party got 5.24% last election being the coalition party with least votes, while the pirate party got 0.63%, behind SD and FI which got 2.93% and 0.68% respectively. So saying that the pirate party was close to a seat in parliment is not really true at all.