Sorta strange claims. We did 100% opensource/mostlyopen hardware LTE (read: 4G) four years ago, and the only thing that limited bandwidth was the spectrum and how much one'd like to pay for the hardware (connectivity and the rest are the same for 5G)

This 5G is just like the hydrogen hype: let's sell some new shit, so people forget how some older shit still is entirely adequate for their needs.

Only this shit costs many times more in installation and maintenance than it would ever recoup in energy, so it makes perfect sense to just pretend to do it. This is France, not Florida.

omg

this is so clueless a take that I don't even.

go read some history

My estimate is that you are full of shit.

Climate is not modelled with sensationalist news crap. In fact it is not yet known if it can ever be modelled at all, which is a polite phrasing for "we don't know shit and chaotic systems are chaotic".

Now, basing your life decisions on "sensationalist news crap" is basic lunacy. Good luck with that, but please "start your actions a decade ago" in solitude.

Yeah sure, tell me about it.

I lived then and I personally remember this ice age crap.

Just this monday I HAD to drive 1000 miles in under 20 hours. There were three stops - two of about 10 minutes, and one of about 30.

  BEV and/or hydrogen can't do that and won't be able to do that ever.

With their poverty levels this is lunacy.

Obviously you never worked in first-line support.

Be it as it may.

Point is, GSO is dead and they had to do something, anything.

I very much doubt OneWeb will get anywhere.

It's just that geosynch sat datalinks have become obsolete.

So Eutelsat woke up at last and decided to sell their junk while they can.

That's fucking rich.

Everything is propaganda.

We're talking about Russia here.

Besides 90-95% of those thousands were had by nonexistent opsec or unrelated leaks, not by ledger tracking.

Only them officials can't even imagine what a supercomputer is.

An every single one tech who could had either fled alredy, or won't ever work for the them.

Not to mention that there ain't no supercomputers for that and not a single one will be shipped there.

So no.

> don't try to turn whatever they received into real money.

There's plenty of not-very-shady way to do that already. It's not like no one expected this sort of bulshit.

In any case "industry experts" are full of shit as usual and "officials have proven savvy in using on-chain analytics" is just laughable. No they haven't and won't ever.

They also don't know shit about hacking and can't learn. Win-win, eh?