I think the nudity was her husband, not her.

Anyone convicted of a federal crime committed after November 1, 1987, has to complete at least 85% of their sentence, no parole allowed. Even in a halfway house, she will be subject to strict behavioral rules.

/sigh

I don't have time for this.

We all know this is going to end up being used by people with pr0n habits - and at that resolution they might even see parts of the female anatomy that they didn't know existed.

Professor, without knowing precisely what the danger is, would you say it's time for our viewers to crack each other's heads open and feast on the goo inside?

Yes I would, Kent.

That was about their opinion shows, not their news shows. That case was specifically about Tucker Carlson.

Those kinds of arguments weren't saving Fox from the Dominion lawsuit, though. If they seemed like to have worked, Fox wouldn't have settled for almost $800 million right before trial.

Hastert doesn't have a law named after him. There's the Hastert Rule, which is an informal rule that no bill should be brought before the House to vote on it unless it already has the support of the majority of the majority party.

Hastert was convicted of structuring withdrawals to avoid reporting requirements and making false statements. The charges themselves were not inherently about homosexuality, though it came about from him covering up his same-sex abuse of a minor, and the indictment didn't mention the sexual abuse, and his allocution under the plea deal didn't initially mention it. He did admit it under pressure from the judge, who seemed to start to lean against accepting his plea without him admitting to the molestation, for which he could not be charged because the statute of limitations had expired decades prior.

Hastert has never come out as gay. Most child molesters, even those who molest the same sex, never identify as homosexual.

Number 7 according to Car & Driver, which I think is much more trustworthy than whatever "Wealthy Driver" is. The Car & Driver list is also applies to 2025 rather than 2023.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.caranddriver.com%2Fn...

Sooooo CHIPS Act?

The result being an unbalanced risk pool, insurers pulling out, and escalating costs for those remaining. But hey, they Owned the Libs!!!111!!

A sensible approach? The CHIPS Act was sensible. Putting tariffs on raw materials and on equipment needed to build and then expecting an industry to pop up because you constrained supply is just stupid. We aren't actually the only consumer and as farmers found his last term sometimes markets just go away and find other customers.

No, I'd say it requires an awful lot of help from those around him, and I look forward to it all being exposed in the future - hopefully not the distant future.

So an AI implementation hacked an AI platform - and Alabama is investigating?

I thought Alabama was more accepting of penetration by related entities?

A company which makes money because AI exists - doesn't want this!

More news at 11.

Yabba dabba don't?

It's not a remotely level playing field. One soldier who took part in the Venezuela raid basically had orders in hand when he placed multiple bets on the timing of the raid, netting a ton of money. There have been many other examples of inside information being used to stack the odds.