Last month, a study was posted in Science that said wind turbines in Africa could boost vegetation in the semi-desert regions at the edge of the Sahara: Study: Large-scale wind and solar farms in the Sahara would increase heat, rain, vegetation

Seems like there's no real reason to avoid using wind turbines in either study, at least not compared to fossil fuels, and yet inevitably this headline will make the rounds, no one will read the article, we'll all forget last month's study, and in the end we'll just have some wrong, dumb little talking point.

With a little work, you could have snuck in a nice little Seinfeld reference.