If the audience comes away with diverging opinions about the interpretations you saw in it, then lots of people will watch and discuss it. That's what it's really about right? Tech, sales, "innovation," gender wars.... not Elizabeth Holmes per se as more than a case study.

You can't write three paragraphs on why something is dishonest hyperbole then pivot right to charges for allowing it? what? to happen. It didn't do the things they say it did.

You can't have both. You guys are weird. Anything under the umbrella of AI safety and alignment "research" is practically a cult. The anthropomorphizing is one facet of it, they believe some AI god will take form. Do not rationalize them as crash test safety engineers. These folks are saying things like by sending the car into a wall at high velocity with no choice it decided to preserve its course of action and eject the occupants into oncoming traffic, that we made sure was just within reach of the test site, and it didn't even ask why the brakes weren't working or how the passengers felt, the car is misaligned with human values!!!11 The reason it seems to conflict with your senses is because of the cult logic. Cars can be unsafe, and you can distrust them, but when you all pick up on the bullshit, I can't believe they are anthropomorphizing cars, then follow with, they're letting cars murder people, you're being idiots.

AI "alignment" is a doomsday cult. The guy holding the end is near sign is starting dumpster fires. I'm just saying I get why you can agree with him that the world is shitty, but also don't take the guy who is setting dumpster fires word for it.

"My family doesn't want to" is the argument I cannot refute. But it is a choice. And I'm not even down on the choice. It's called discretionary spending for a reason, and if that's where you choose to spend it you aren't making a bad choice. Just not a frugal one.

I'm really only pointing out that with a small amount of restraint you can have a wonderful palate of content for under $25 a month.

Dude it's a cult. That human values, alignment, self improving crap comes directly from the AI alignment and safety cult that OpenAI and Anthropic and others are full of. It's where all the conflicting messaging comes from, all the accusations of Altman saying one thing doing another comes from those folks that are concerned he isn't drinking the right amount of koolaid. They believe AI will become a god, and only they can be trusted to build it.

OpenAI and Anthropic are full of them. Anytime you see some "AI safety researcher" quit all huffing and puffing out the door, it's one of those people causing drama. Anthropic was started by folks from OpenAI that reaaaaaly drank the koolaid, see the inviting religious leaders, the don't hurt the AI feelings stuff, the constant drop of the AI is conscious, etc.

They're fucking nuts, and any accidents that come out of an "AI safety" lab at any of these companies deserves heavy squinting. Making a point by any means and generating scary headlines is their entire goal. And yes, it does seem to conflict with the company's mission. Until you understand these companies are full of people that sincerely think the mission is only they can be trusted in the race to build AI god.

So, anyway, outside of that, I'm not saying standard internet safety stuff isn't warranted. Some auditing and reporting thresholds, know your customer, age regulation, they're worth looking at, just filter out the AI safety nuts because that whole field isn't what it looks like.

If only his cautionary words about the risks of AI software development had been heeded, he would have been a big name in the never-ending dumbeat about the "sotware crisis" for the last 50 years!

What does that actually mean, a kebab shop on every corner (yay), or more abortion restrictions, sin taxes, dry counties, blue laws like can't buy a car on a Sunday, can't buy wine before 10am, can't look at a beer after driving west past the third armadillo cause law and order Jesus says so, posted in every classroom?

You're afraid of there was another religion at the table all your stupid religious laws might have to go, I'm calling it. Big talk from Texas politicians, not a lot of legislating cause it might cut a little close to home huh, fucking hypocrites.

Baked into your reply is the bald assumption that it's okay to pirate. I think it's stealing and it's not okay. So your point may be valid for you, but not for others and not for the law.

Besides... your way carries costs too. VPN subscription, time spent searching torrent sites, storage , and non tangible costs like inconvenience. Finding out you grabbed the French version without multi language tracks... finding extra files in the torrent... streaming from a NAS if you consume in your living room...

Well those people have a self inflicted problem. I can't help them. But I don't know what end they are driving at. Periodic episode erooo pi s takes immediate gratification off the table anyway. If they can't just wait until the last episode drops to binge the series they're doing it wrong.

A sandboxed development environment still has access to a git remote to pull and push branches, how else would they work? If you're going to wave hands and say that's different, you literally have no clue how access controls on this scion thing works.

If you actually airgap development systems, what are you even talking about, like mount a read only copy of the code in a container, then scrape the ephemeral storage layer off from the outside as you tear it down? Then the system preserving your hypothetical airgapped development uses source control itself to commit the work. The source control system literally does not matter. For local version control you could use anything, or nothing at all. You could use svn then translate it to git commits, you could use git then translate it to scion.. commits? You could just take the whole working copy it produced and squashed commit into whatever the external source control of the day is. Christ you could use svn locally, offline, then translate it into.. external svn commits. It's not rocket surgery. I could fart out scripts to do all of those in any combination in tens of minutes. How could anyone ever think this is only possible with git, like it's the only possible way to do offline development?/!

The actual problem is how many people have opinions on git, and lack a first principals based understanding of how version control even works.

He has given us his shoe! This is a sign that all who follow him shall do likewise! The shoe is the sign! It's a sandal! Gather the shoes! Follow the gourd!

The only thing git adoption proves is that sketch is timeless.

I'm not sure how every centralized version control system can be described as reinventing svn. Or every distributed version control system is a reinvention of git? You can't imagine ways they can be different or improved? Yikes

Fuck off, racist piece of shit.

Agreed, and centralized coordination is a HUGE simplifying assumption to the task at hand.

The best way to make streaming cost effective is simply to subscribe to a different service each month. If you insist on continuously carrying a suite of services, the value per dollar drops off. But maintain a single service in rotation, and there has never been a better media entertainment value for your dollar. It's vastly better than cable ever was.

Of course sports junkies have a different scenario...

That damned weight sensor! With my kids it screws up all the time because one person is scanning and other person is standing there holding the previous thing fumbling with the next bag. I started scanning then setting the item outside the bag on the platform instead of handing it off. Then whoever is bag wrangling can bag it in their own time. I think that works, at least I haven't seen the place item on bagging area message in a while.

I can pretend I'm a robot arm on an assembly line, but it sucks for anyone that doesn't predict the shitty programming I guess, that's fair.