I would disagree with that. I think we have all heard a "I would like to shoot them" and a gun enthusiast may even add "and I am going to the range today." Last time I checked, both would kill you. The bullet would be a lot harder to dodge then embalming fluid. I would doubt that someone who is about to commit murder would write about their plot to kill someone on Facebook. It is far more plausible that they wrote as they were about to engage in an activity that would relive some stress, and not harm someone else.

I don't think banning the student is the right thing to do. How about talking to her and find out what is going on first.

So an honest lawyer...I guess it is true then. 99% of lawyers make the rest of them look bad.

Teese is right. The three judge panel ruled unanimously.
http://wislawjournal.com/article.cfm/2009/05/18/Court-finds-GPS-tracking-without-search-OK-Fourth-Amendment-is-not-implicated-by-tracking

Ohh.. you said Ponzi...not Fonzi

My Bad

Oh no..not the CDA!

I like how the Guild also ignores the fact that the Kindle helps the authors revenue. With my Kindle, I cannot give that book to a friend to read, sell it do a used book store, or donate it to a library. If those people want to read the book I bought, they would need to borrow my Kindle (not going to happen) or obtain there own copy.

The more Kindles there are, with people buying e-books from Amazon, the less paper books will be in circulation for the used book market.