Comment Re:Mount Doane (Score 1) 26
Naming things after people is never so much a celebration as it is about notability.
So you're saying every town should have an Adolf Hitler street?
Naming things after people is never so much a celebration as it is about notability.
So you're saying every town should have an Adolf Hitler street?
Ironically the main choices I can think of are:
- if DIY a Pixel - they most reliably come with unlockable bootloader,
No. Google just took the Pixel device trees out of AOSP and is not publishing them elsewhere. Alternate OSes for Pixel devices just died.
Some ideas don't require lengthy exposition, but SEO demands longer articles, and that leads to this. In a reasonable world an editor would have ripped half this article's guts out due to redundancy.
It was that way here until the oil crisis, which shrank cars for a while. Now they are inflated again, but as things are getting crappier here, smaller vehicles are returning. If you have lots of space and fuel is cheap, larger vehicles are lovely. If neither thing is true, they are just more trouble and expense than they are worth.
Vehicles being higher up has little influence on how far their headlights cast, especially given safe following distances they are the least relevant thing. They are just commonly poorly aimed. I thought Europe had inspections for that kind of thing, though? In the US we theoretically do, but I see misaimed headlights constantly.
Technology is the answer, though. I don't plan to learn another script, though I might learn another language. But why should anyone have to? Computers are actually good at recognizing text and doing translations now. That's two legit uses for "AI" that have actually come true. For example I've successfully OCR'd Chinese documentation and translated it and had it not come out in broken English. This really makes one wonder why anyone is still doing bad documentation and ads, but I do still see them regularly. So weird.
...that there's a LOT of minerals and other nutrients in food, only a fraction of which are produced from chemicals in fertilisers, O2, and CO2. If you produce too much with too little consideration of the impact on the soil, you can produce marvellous dust bowls but eventually that's ALL you will produce.
There's a lot of stuff that is on the Internet that doesn't end up in AIs, either because the guys designing the training sets don't consider it a particular priority or because it's paywalled to death.
So the imbalance isn't just in languages and broader cultures, it's also in knowledge domains.
However, AI developers are very unlikely to see any of this as a problem, for one very very important reason --- it means they can sell the extremely expensive licenses to those who actually need that information, who can then train their own custom AIs on it. Why fix a problem where the fix means your major customers pay you $20 a month rather than $200 or $2000? They're really not going to sell ten times, certainly not a hundred times, as many $20 doing so, so there's no way they can skim off the corps if they program their AIs properly.
Let's take a look at software sizes, for a moment.
UNIX started at around 8k, and the entire Linux kernel could happily sit in the lower 1 megabyte of RAM for a long time, even with capabilities that terrified Microsoft and Apple.
The original game of Elite occuped maybe three quarters of a 100k floppy disk and used swapping and extensive use of data files to create a massive universe that could be loaded into 8k of RAM.
On a 80386SX with 5 megabytes of RAM (Viglens were weird but fun) and a 20 megabyte hard drive, running Linux, I could simultaneously run 7 MMORGs, X11R4, a mail server, a list server, an FTP server, a software router, a web server, a web cache, a web search engine, a web browser, and stil have memory left over to play Netrek, without slowing anything down.
These days, that wouldn't be enough to load the FTP server, let alone anything else.
On the one hand, not everything can be coded to SEL4 standards (although SEL4, by using Haskell as an initial language to develop the core and the proofs, was able to cut the cost of formal programming to around 1% of the normal value). On the other hand, a LOT of space is gratuitously wasted.
Yes, multiple levels of abstraction are a part of the problem. Nothing wrong with abstraction, OpenLook is great, but modern abstraction is mostly there due to incompetent architecture on previous levels and truly dreadful APIs. And, yes, APIs are truly truly dreadful if OpenLook is the paragon of beauty by comparison.
Just don't engage yourself by contract
Ah yes, don't participate in modern society. I see you are very smart.
It's not a surprise if human knowledge which is kept secret doesn't show up in LLMs. And today, not putting any knowledge on the internet is effectively that. The reason all our nerd shit shows up in LLM data is that we made it freely available to all on the open internet.
Fuck you cowardly oil-sucking cucks.
If I could just transform my Windoze to run as a virtual machine under Linux, my boss probably wouldn't really mind...
I don't know how hard it would be to do with your existing install, but I have Windows 11 in a QEMU/KVM VM with a virtual TPM and it works fine...
Point out some Nazi shit and get modded down.
B!zX puts Re!ch in the word filter, and also has put Nazi in there multiple times, to try to prevent people from talking about Nazis
Slashdot must be run by Nazis.
Filling up the gas tank does not take a lot of time.
Cleaning up the mess from all the people filling and then subsequently emptying the large tanks for their large cars is something we literally do not know how to do, so it can be considered to take an infinite amount of time and cost an infinite amount of money.
If people cared only about fuel efficiency and emissions, everyone would be driving tiny cars (gas powered or electric).
People don't care, so we should burn the world! What a fucking stupid, senseless, self-centered argument.
The laws ARE garbage.
On what basis?
If a test can be rigged, it will be.
The laws are garbage because people will cheat on the laws? That sounds more like the cheaters are garbage, and you're an enabler.
The US has a similar problem, we have CAFE standards that were SUPPOSED to require car manufacturers to increase efficiencies to IMPOSSIBLE levels
Every. Single. Car. Company. In. The. US. Can. Meet. Those. Standards.
They choose not to.
The law of unintended consequences is undefeated
Guess who bought these laws? These are intended consequences.
All great ideas are controversial, or have been at one time.