Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Today, AI needs more verification than humans . (Score 1) 166

The current AI state of the art is that AI needs more human verification than humans do. :-)

  1. pretty sure the list meant that, in the future, these jobs will be at risk. Not currently. But I'm to lazy to check
  2. other aspect of this is if AI can produce something 100x faster than a human, and the human can review it faster than they could do it then it will take less humans

Comment Re:Are they really better today? (Score 1) 57

Another interesting part of this, for sure. Zone training as well as personal performance and recovery tracking has been another big change.

They also do blood testing every hour on some of their training rides for tracking and performance monitoring - some riders have their own testers and test themselves in the off season.

Comment Re:Are they really better today? (Score 1) 57

Do they explain why proper training, proper food and proper sleep without doping is better than proper training, proper food and proper sleep _with_ doping? No? They're full of shit.

Agree, the easy way will always be taken (at least by some). Look I've been fooled enough on this front to be anything but skeptical, however it is interesting to see some of the things these people do to improve performance that you or I can easily (and safely) do to improve our personal performances. Look at the last 5 years - sauna, ice baths, compression pants, sleep technology, nutrition information - hard to believe that all of that is not at least a part of the performance gains. But, as you said, throw in some EPO on top of that and you'll look like Floyd Landis in the 2006 Tour de France Stage 17

Comment Re:Are they really better today? (Score 1) 57

Which is why I've never much liked elite level sports.

They literally feature a collection of genetic freaks. It's nothing like normal, human sporting fun.

Barring doping, they are human and represent the extremes that a human can reach naturally. Isn't that what sports (highlights for sure) are for, people in awe over what another human can do?

"Hey! That's the same species as me" (as I sit on the couch stuffing bon-bons down my throat)

Comment Are they really better today? (Score 5, Interesting) 57

Interesting videos out there discussing this. Some interesting points:
1. Athletes train year round now and are able to achieve higher gains - they used to take months off and lose conditioning
2. Nutrition: cyclists use to take much less nutrition during these long races, they now ingest double the nutrients from 5-10 years ago. This is due to altering the nutrient mix to help aid and speed ingestion.
3. Sleep: there are cycling teams that literally clear out hotel rooms and replace mattresses, add lighting, A/C and air filtration systems to improve sleep quality.

So are they better, or just better prepared? I would say that the selection of people who fit the design of a professional cyclist just keeps getting smaller -- enduring years of constant training, having a digestive system that can handle the high/concentrated nutrient intake levels -- but also have all the physical attributes that make for great cyclists already (VO2 max, size, body type, etc) is getting smaller.

So my answer is that they are getting better in comparison to athletes from before, we are just finding people that better fit the requirements for each sport. It's like when all the sports teams were whites only, people didn't necessarily get better but the people in those sports were better than before.

Comment The real question (Score 1) 63

Yes, we are all appalled and shocked.

Who are the people that heard this idea and did not immediately strike it as an option. There is nothing ambiguous about the idea of using foreign workers to maintain state security apparatus. I don't care what country you live in, that is a horrible idea.

So here is the real question: Is this treasonous?

Comment Re:I Disagree ... Pragmatism (Score 1) 73

I continue to care only about whether they have useful applications today, once you've understood their limitations.

The point being made, I think, is to ignore all the hype, propaganda, marketing and sales pitches and focus on whether the tool is useful to you.

Make up your own mind and please don't tell me about it :)

Slashdot Top Deals

There is hardly a thing in the world that some man can not make a little worse and sell a little cheaper.

Working...