I dunno. I had a friend who used to work on it back when it started. He *might* miss it.

And is well on its way to possibly lose everything.

As a Canadian, last I checked it was legal to download here but not to upload (i.e. distribute).

It was the first link in the submission. :)

There you see it
Sitting there across the way
It don’t got a lot to say
But there’s something about it
And you don’t know why
But you’re dying to try
You wanna click the link

You’ve got to click the link
Why don’t you click the link
You gotta click the link
Go on and click the link

In this context, "Kids are being graduated from HS without knowing how to read and write." is grammatically correct. Admittedly, it may be more difficult than necessary to parse correctly; however, it is the teachers that are graduating the students from high school. So, kids are being graduated from high school [by their teachers] without knowing how to read and write. The use of the passive voice in this case puts extra emphasis that they were not deserving to receive a diploma.

Source: I was awarded my high school English award.

Yeah, they beat Rogers out by a hair.

The Canadian government violates Canadian privacy laws. It's actually impressive we still have a privacy commissioner.

Nope, I've always lived in North America. However, I have moved a lot, and it might be that I'm subconsciously relating which way I'm going to where I think the water is. It's west on the west coast, north when in Ottawa and south when in Toronto. Hard to say. It would be so much easier if my brain could just use the sun. :)

I'd use it to work on my horrible spatial navigation skills and figure out exactly why I consistently think I'm going the right way when I'm going either 90 or 180 degrees away from it.

Sex isn't trademarked, so domain squatting doesn't apply. It's a domain that he bought and owned and as a result had a right to do whatever he wanted with it.

It'll be interesting to see how long it takes for the mainstream media to run with this.

Mostly Harmless.

The original paper is here: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1502.0141... What they effectively do is create a set of all the tokens and punctuation in a method and then compress that set to include only those tokens that are "useful". They then compare the length of this set with the original method. I don't see how this is any more useful than compiling the method, looking at its bytes, and stating this method is mostly chaff since it can be reduced into a single 0 and 1, i.e. its BINSET is {0, 1}.

An example threshed set they provide for java bubblesort is: int, length, =, array, ., for, (, 1, 0, , ;, if, ++, ), {, [, j, 1, ., |, ], temp, }. If you're a programmer, you can probably see how silly this is just from looking at that set.

Screenshots of more than just the settings would have been nice.

Well, you were never fully functional because you were using C++.