Comment Re:I don't remember this ever coming up (Score 1) 28
OK, that was good. I'd have given you a +1 Funny if I hadn't used up all of my mod points yesterday.
OK, that was good. I'd have given you a +1 Funny if I hadn't used up all of my mod points yesterday.
"Dirty" can come in many forms. Saw a documentary on them not too long ago.
* Noise of generators and cooling systems, the DC being built too close to existing homes, more of a zoning council fail but it happens as DC money can make the council turn a blind eye to the local residents desires.
* Vibration, lots of big engines and such can create vibrations that travel thru the ground (or very low frequency) that can disturb sleep and such even if it doesn't measure on the sound meter.
* Diesel exhaust if that's used for generators.
* Water supplies can be consumed (& denied to locals) or even "contaminated" (like being warmed too much for the local wildlife), or aquifers can be drained faster than they can replenish.
* Electricity as this article is about
* Dropping local property values of existing homes
* Taxation issues because cities want to bring the DC in and give tax abatements, but there are still local services required so the extra costs get passed on to others
They don't really bring all that many jobs, but city leadership trying to "diversify" seem want to bring them in. My personal opinion is to put them at least 5 miles from anything else, they can all build together, do their own power plant just for them, and figure out how to do water as long as they don't draw from an aquifer (maybe build their own lake or draw from the ocean).
Since he can clearly identify them, just redirect the request to Facebook dot com and let Meta eat itself.
The IEA has good data for what's happened (history). They are notoriously bad when it comes to predictions, i.e. looking back at past predictions shows them to be wrong almost every time. So I'm not believing this one either. What happens, happens. The IEA can tell you really did happen after the fact.
When desalination plants are built, I hear about the worry of the left over "brine" being too salty so they have to be careful about putting it back into the ocean. In this case, you pull out water a little easier, it would actually help to put saltier water back, so it sounds like a win-win to me. Yeah, the current is huge, so do lots of desalination plants for the volume and ship the water somewhere useful.
I've got a 7" Lenovo and a 10" Lenovo (really the wife's), I'd have to go find the models but they were bought probably in '21 or '22. Both are decent and get the job done. I think I tried to go too cheap and the CPU is barely adequate, so be willing to spend an extra $50 or $100 to get a good CPU. Even with the only adequate CPU, I can still player tower games just fine, watch YT videos, and browse IMDB and such without any problems
So first question for you (original questioner) to answer is what size screen do you need? You might want to try to find a used one for cheap to try. They all have their pluses and minuses. The only real downside I've found on the Android tablets is that I have to buy them on Amazon and buy based on specs (as in I can't play with it before buying); with an iPad, you could at least go try one out at an Apple store (or so I'd think, but I don't really know as I don't have any Apple products).
I've got a couple of Android tablets. I've never found a case hard to find. I can't say about accessories because I've never needed any. The only thing I could imagine would be a keyboard, but there are BT versions of those that should work with any tablet.
+1 Where are my mod-points when I need them.
If the manufacturer wants to be the only one who can repair the equipment, then one of their representatives needs to be *immediately available* to repair. They can ship out with the fleet, regiment, or whatever
Occasionally I do. However, more often than not I go to a used book store to save a few bucks. Authors nor publishers benefit from that, but it doesn't bother me as I give a book a good home.
Batteries are expensive and don't scale on demand very well. Steel tanks can be produced much more quickly and cheaply.
I'm going to disagree. Remember, we're talking about H2, the smallest molecule, which has a lot of trouble being contained and also tends to make metals weak and brittle (or hydrogen embrittlement). An H2 tank failure is not a good thing.
OTOH, batteries aren't all that hard to make and they can build a new Tesla Megapack in an hour or so. (Of course, there is a wait list, but getting the right number of packs is an exercise in up-front planning.) Last I heard, a Megapack3 is about $1.4M to hold ~5MWh. I don't know what it would cost to create an H2 storage tank to contain that much energy, but again, it'd have to be a very special tank (because H2) and I doubt those come cheap (especially if the H2 comes in liquefied form as now it comes under high pressure). Personally, I'm really looking forward to Sodium-Ion batteries that are supposed to hit mass market scale in the next year or two (they're already out in small quantities), as that should cut the battery part price in half, although some say it'll be even cheaper than that.
Here's some efficiency numbers...
If you start with & stay with electricity, after transportation/distribution, you end up with ~94% of your original energy starting amount at the site for usage.
If you start with electricity then change to H2, after electrolysis + transportation/distribution, you end up with ~68% of your original starting energy at the site for usage.
Hmm, which is more, 94% or 68%?
However for those who say "use a fuel cell" for the H2 to make electricity, the chart goes on to show the overall efficiency for electric only (or solar->electricity->battery->electricty) to end up at 77%. Meanwhile, the fuel cell route causes the overall efficiency to end up at a frightening 33% of original energy left. That further reinforces the idea that if you start with electricity, just stay there.
+10
I don't care for sports all that much either and if ESPN died tomorrow I wouldn't shed a tear (in fact I'd probably rejoice). My 1 weakness is the olympics though.
... I don't actually know if it is Firefox or UBO.
Definitely FF. I believe I've seen it more often on sites that want to auto-update the page every so often. Usually it's the active tab, but not always. Last time it happened to me, IIRC I had a few Youtube tabs open, listening to each one before closing. Suddenly, the video stops about 5min in, controls within the tab were non-responsive, "xosview" showed a core pegged at 100% with others flickering too, "top" showed an an "Isolated Web Co" process taking like 200%. I killed FF, eventually my system returned to normal. Started it back up and restarted the video and FF ran for another week just fine. So YT does it, I've had news sites do it too. I really should file a bug but one probably already exists.
>"So, a standard Firefox session in other words.
To be funny, there has to be some underlying truth or irony involved. But in this case, there isn't either. Firefox memory usage is pretty consistently lower than Chrom*.
The vast majority of the time, you're correct. However, from time to time I have [a Linux] desktop FF just go crazy where a tab suddenly starts to eat RAM, taking multiple GB and just holding a core hostage at 100% usage. If I'm lucky, I can figure out which tab it is and close it
I agree, if it doesn't have a community, just stop working on it; assign the few workers left to other projects. There are other DE for Ubuntu that work well, like KDE, or XFCE.
We can predict everything, except the future.