Comment Summary ... (Score 2) 14
The following was in my submission on the firehose, but the editors opted to remove it
Some of the key points, from the published article's summary:
- Permanent DST preserves later evening light that may facilitate commuting, recreation, social participation, and some economic activity, but it also prolongs darkness on winter mornings, with potential adverse effects on circadian alignment, sleep, mood, education, and productivity.
- Permanent ST is more closely aligned with circadian biology, although earlier dusk may limit some evening activities.
- Choosing Permanent ST is supported by accumulated evidence related to health and the recommendations of major sleep and chronobiology societies; if Canadian jurisdictions choose to adopt Permanent DST, implementation should include anticipatory mitigation, protection for disproportionately affected groups, and transparent surveillance of population health impacts.
Unfortunately, it seems that politicians and a good chunk of the public prefer Permanent DST.