Comment Re: This is a good time to remind everyone (Score 1) 238
Why are there no conservative professors? Seems to me the protesters should be first in line to have their horizons expanded.
Why are there no conservative professors? Seems to me the protesters should be first in line to have their horizons expanded.
Ofcourse there are no no-go zones inthe UK. Little girls are for indtance always welcome into the muslim areas.
Are you saying this is justice?
There was a trial actually, because someone on the Everquest team said they included the DIKUmud code. DIKU team lost for lack of evidence.
The only one who wants a war is Putin. But war is upon us, and the only two ways it ends is a win or a loss. We want to win.
It used to be 30 though.
The Gulf of Denmark!
Herz decision was about resale value. When Elon dropped prices, they lost a lot of money. Seeing that he might do it again, they are abandoning evâ(TM)s altogether.
Understandable. But also short sighted.
But you don't go around assigning "normal" label to everything that is normal. The "normal" people didn't ask for this. And do not apply it in daily use.
Wrong.
If you describe someone as heterosexual, which statistically speaking, is the norm, it is not considered a slur, and is regularly used.
You're trying to turn a personal discomfort of yours into some kind of objective truth, and it's transparent and pathetic.
You will notice, that this is not something that was in use, even back in Latin Rome.
The prefix cis? Of course it was.
Do you mean just in the context of gender? If so, then you really are a fucking moron.
Knowledge that your brain was the source of your intelligence also wasn't known "back in Latin Rome". Doesn't make it less biologically true.
The reason being that in order to communicate fast and easily, the most used words are usually short, and superfluous words are excluded, and only the exceptions are mentioned. As in homosexual, which is the exception to normal sexuality.
And yet the word heterosexual exists, has been in use for quite some time, and nobody has labeled it a slur.
The premise of your argument is absurd.
See also Huffman codes and the Zip algorithm if any of that rings a bell. It is also how our brain stores information. By simply ignoring the things that are common.
I'm a BSCS. The idea that the brain stores information in a way anything like a Huffman code is fucking patently absurd.
You are desperately grasping for anything to justify your mislabeling a technical descriptor as a slur. It's fucking weak.
Well, why do you think you remember less and less of every day? Why does it take longer the first time you walk a route? Because the brain just stores reference to prior experiences. This is how the zip algorithm work basically. Implementations may wary.
Now I don't think people in Rome labelled themselves cisgender. In fact, I see no evidence of this ever occurring in history. Anywhere. Transgender people have existed since before we were humans. And yet, only now they have a need to label the rest of us. No thank you.
The rest of your post is.. well confusing I must say. I don't think you understood what I said.
All data suggest its not easy to be a transgender.
You are always born in the body you appear to be in. No need to make up names for it.
Sometimes you would wish you were not, but I think you have to suffer it until some kind of soul transfer is invented by Elon.
Now, everyone is free to claim they are in reality a woman. That is their right. However, the rest of us has the right to disagree. To say that, no, we do not believe you are a woman. We will not allow a person with a penis into a woman's prison.
As I wrote elsewhere, in language we assign labels mostly to the unusual. So adding a label here, where none is needed, is considered derogatory by many.
So it has to stop. It's a slur.
I don't think people change names just because someone else makes a mistake. At least not here in this country.
As for Twitter, I will take with me, that I can insult anything as long as I judge them not to have feelings.
Thank you. Made my day. So many people just don't understand that last part.
You're a fucking moron.
The prefix cis- comes from Latin and means "on the same side as" or "of". It is often used in contrast to the prefix trans-, which means "on the other side of" or "beyond".
It's as much a slur as "homosexual" is, which it isn't.
You're upset that a thing you consider "normal" has been assigned a label, nothing more.
But you don't go around assigning "normal" label to everything that is normal. The "normal" people didn't ask for this. And do not apply it in daily use.
You will notice, that this is not something that was in use, even back in Latin Rome.
The reason being that in order to communicate fast and easily, the most used words are usually short, and superfluous words are excluded, and only the exceptions are mentioned. As in homosexual, which is the exception to normal sexuality.
See also Huffman codes and the Zip algorithm if any of that rings a bell. It is also how our brain stores information. By simply ignoring the things that are common.
This moron has 5 degrees
Did you just deadname X and failed to know the name of it's owner?
Why are you here, if facts interests you so little?
So they have a choice between gay or cis?
Don't use those kind of dating sites.
Nobody identifies as "cis". Nobody calls themselves "cis". Nobody has asked to be called "cis".
Its a slur meant to make the normal unnormal.
IOT trap -- core dumped