Exactly. No idea why people confuse this.

Abandoned Netflix years ago. I do not miss it.

It was Aliens. They were out there raking the sand making it all smooth.

Not really. They all demand certain hooks that will give up your identity. For if they allowed truly anonymous behaviour I could visit twitter without an account. Try visiting and seeing content on Facebook or Twitter without an account. Reddit will allow it for the most part, but Instagram nags you. The others just say log in to see this content.

DUDE you nailed it! If social media really cared they would have done this already. But they realize it will lead to less clicks, less addictions.

How less addictions? Because kids will have to find other means to amuse themselves. You know like maybe going outside? Doing sports? Having a hobby? There have been quite a few studies that have indicated social media at such a young age is not good for the development of the mind. Once you are older it is less problematic.

No this is not a government issued license to allow you to speak. Children can continue to speak. They can continue to interact on the Internet. However... people drive at either 16 or 18. People are considered adults at 18. People can legally drink from 16 to 21 depending on the country. The list goes on there are plenty of restrictions and they make sense. Free speech is not absolute. Otherwise if you really believe it you would not be a paranoid anonymous coward. You would put your money where your mouth is.

Oh go to hell, stupid son of a bitch. People like you are disgusting. You sit there on your high horse behind a keyboard where its safe to say bullshit like this. Comparing Trump to Hitler? You really are fucking disgusting. You there and make casual comments like this with having a god damn clue what Hitler and his regime was really like. You have not the slightest idea what living under a real dictator is like.

Go find someone that survived the camps of WWII. Let them show you the tattoos, listen to their stories on what Hitler was really like. Go find some Cubans that drifted to freedom on a raft of milk jugs. Talk to them what a real dictator is.

Till then, when you have a real idea about what a real dictatorship is like. Shut the fuck up.

Go ahead, do it. I dare you too. This is not the same Trump administration as the first one. Filing a false clam like that is a crime, and opens you for civil liability.

You idiots need to back off and read the god damn room. Trump didn't just eek by like in 2016. He was carried in golden surf board riding a red wave. He won the popular vote and the electoral college by margins not seen since Reagan. An not in just one demographic; in almost all demographics he was up by double digits. This includes Latins who he is threatening to deport. They don't want the illegals here ether.

An it just doesn't stop there. Democrats lost the House and the Senate, as well. You almost lost California. Take a look at the district maps on election returns for California. They tossed out that horrible DA and replace him with a Republican. Next round of elections, California might turn red.

What happened Thursday was a sound rejection of the Democratic party's agenda. Might be time for you step back and examine your own policies. An if you are here illegally, might be time for you get legal or hit that road back to where you came from.

Why are you classified as a troll? You asked the right question. When I read the headline;

"Adjusting for this bias revealed that the summer of 2023 was about 2.3 C above pre-industrial temperatures from this period. "

I read BS. Let me explain it this way. Imagine you do statistical sampling. It relies on the fact that data follows a Gaussian curve. The problem is that if your data is incomplete, LIKE SAID IN THE ARTICLE, then you can't do statistical adjustment. Of course it has not stopped the statisticians making things up, but it still does not make it right.

What makes this bias adjustment worse is that we are considered to have a completely out of whack value. Since we are not following the gaussian curve since we are out of whack it means the data is useless.

UNLESS and here is where it bugs me to no end, we want to make the assertion that climate change is out of control and a statistical outlier. Guess which one folks are following. Yeah... This is why I am skeptical, and why it surprises me that you are marked as a troll.

But here is the problem even as a first pass it is bad as a first pass. Let's do a first pass and I get somebody who has rigged the paper to pass through the system. If we see a B or even an A and assume the system assignment is correct then we have a false negative. Thus if this happens often enough what then? How can you trust a system that has that? You have to read each and every one of the papers, which puts us right back in square one.

When you feed it a giant cesspool of invalidated data (The internet) you should not expect a single response to be accurate. none of these AI's are fed a carefully curated data set.

But companies are expecting to replace all their programmers with AI.... What could possibly go wrong?

It is very much a monopoly issue. Think of it as follows. You have a company that controls the platform. Then they create a media platform where Apple is a preferred media player. After all trying to get Apple TV working well on non Apple devices is a non-starter. It is kinda there, but it is really is just there for show. Now with one of these shows they create is something that could be considered as comedy journalism.

Thus comes the question are they allowed to use their platform which dominates as a censor? The natural answer seems to be yes they can do what they want. HOWEVER they have a monopoly and thus the rules change. Thus the question from the government is, what were the conditions of this cancellation? Maybe it is abusive power, maybe not, but you don't know until you ask questions.