Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:The problem with SAS (Score 1) 27

SAS has been dead for 15y; it started with R and then Python absolutely destroyed it. No one teaches SAS in universities any longer, why would they? It's terribly expensive and absolutely fucking dead.

We migrated away from SAS back in 2017 and never looked back. The only verticals still using it are heavily regulated and running long-standing legacy code that they're slowly migrating to Python.

I remember absolutely dying when they tried to renegotiate our contract UP back in 2015. I flat out told them they were dead and we were moving away from them and they told me, "good luck managing your data without us!"

Two companies and 10 years later, we're doing just fine and they are not.

Comment My takes on this presentation (Score 1) 6

1. There are a lot of empty seats; a lot.

2. The demo wasn't live, likely due to the huge failure of an event that the Meta one was.

3. They noted that you do all of this 'hands-free', likely an intentional knock at Meta's offering.

4. The examples were...odd. Who the fuck is going to be using this to shop for a fucking rug? Come on; give some real-life examples that are IMPORTANT. None of these were.

5. The entire presentation's style, across multiple different presenters, was...exhausting...halting...jarring...and...really undergraduate level. It was almost as if they were being fed what to say in their earpieces, not from memory and not in a fluid and practiced way.

---

Personally? I love the idea of AR glasses that work well. I want to have live subtitles for humans talking to me as I'm hard of hearing and hearing aids do not work well for me, particularly in public spaces.

I want it to give me important information, respond to my environment in ways that are useful (telling me where I am really isn't that; I know where the fuck I am--tell me what I should be doing or where I should be going next, perhaps?)

I know these are early adopter level devices, but they're just fucking ugly due to their bulk.

I strongly prefer this option to Meta's simply because I don't have to do stupid fucking mime-style hand gestures, but I want this technology to be useful, now, not in 5 years. We're going to see this largely flop just like so many other AR/VR toys out there unless they make this something more than a gimmicky piece of shit.

Comment Re:Complete failure all around (Score 1) 140

You clearly do not live in the US. The legal system does NOT do anything about anything (other than child support and alimony) as outlined in a divorce decree.

And, even if they MIGHT do something, you have to wait 12+ months to get on the court's docket, paying thousands of dollars to glorified expensive secretaries in the process while you wait.

The entire system is fucking broken.

Comment Re: So (Score 1) 152

I was drinking a lot of french press and my cholesterol starting rising fairly dramatically. I've had really good cholesterol numbers my entire life, so this was fairly alarming. I stopped drinking french press and when I had my next test done less than a year later, my cholesterol numbers were back to normal for me. Highly dependent on your individual physiology and the amount of coffee you're drinking, but something to watch out for.

Apparently the paper filters in drip and pour over are effective are effective at blocking the oily compounds that lead to a rise in cholesterol for many people.

Comment Re:Undisclosed Conflicts of Interest! (Score 1) 53

My grandfather died at around 90--of lung cancer! He never smoked a single substance in his life, never worked in factories, etc. It was basically random. Near the end, one of the docs asked if he had been exposed to asbestos. He answered "Well, I did go on a school trip to an asbestos mine in 5th grade..."

Comment So.... tech.... (Score 1) 45

Under the idea of not "doing the easy".... if I owned the complex, I'd provide a hardwire (one or more) to "the whatever" provider (if multiple providers are available) for each tenant, and say "good luck" on the WiFi side allowing the renter to deal with the hassles of density. The alternative would be to place "whole office" management on the complex (easier, more feasible). This is what that new law gets rid of. That is, costing the complex money spent in support of a "sane" infrastructure. As more and more is going to be forced into high density living (assuming you're not living in your parents actual "house"), people who ask for "independence" will also reap the consequences of that. That is, you might get better Internet at the coffee shop (again).... unless wires are your friend. Is it right to allow a building complex with multiple tenants to bear the cost burden of a network solution? Maybe, maybe not. But, there is that "other cost" which might be even more frustrating if you push "the infrastructure" to the tenant.

Comment Great; it shouldn't be a thing. (Score 4, Insightful) 45

> The law "undermines the basis of the cost savings and will lead to bulk billing being phased out," the group said.

Good; it's monopolistic, predatory, and ultimately unnecessary. The entire practice is aimed at driving consistency and forced adoption rates, not anything else.

Slashdot Top Deals

No problem is so large it can't be fit in somewhere.

Working...