Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Complete failure all around (Score 1) 140

This is quite common nowadays, that services are not working, and people are acting stupid.

She should not have assumed that this just gets sorted.

The court should have forced the ex to disband the family group.

The police should come down on him for unauthorised computer espionage.

Apple can help, but they just don't want to.

And obviously the ex is being an ass, but for once, he is not alone in that.

And finally. The real culprit.

Using Apple products in the first place.

Comment Re:Tree's aren't long term carbon sequestration (Score 1) 58

If your criterion is that whatever you do to capture carbon should be something that cannot be undone then there is no way to capture carbon, even mineralization can be undone if you heat it....which is done to make cement so even that is something that could happen.

Well, they german court only ruled the carbon must stay captured for atleast 25 years, but Apple couldn't even do that.

Comment Re:All this? For an..oximeter?? (Score 1) 57

So ya, Masimo's ITC judgement was for blood oximetry. Patents US10912502B2 and US10945648B2.

The real question is how the hell do we have a manufacturer getting new Patents in 2020 over a technology invented in the 1970s? Considering patent protection is only for 20 years, and hand-worn LED-based oximeters have been around for almost 50 years at this point.

It was for power saving while measuring blood oxigen, not the measuement itself. Apple believe they have worked around the patent by moving processing to the phone, since the patent doesnt cover the device being split over two devices.

Slashdot Top Deals

No directory.

Working...