
Wrong on every detail.
1a) Using the "move" RPC command, bitcoin makes an instant transfer between two accounts that you control.
1b) All transactions are published instantly, and available instantly, via the bitcoin P2P network. There are also several websites like http://mtgox.com/ which facilitate instant transfers. After that, you wait on average 10 minutes per confirmation, each of which makes your transaction exponentially more secure. While not recommended, yes you can spend zero-confirmation transactions.
2) Did you bother to look at Android Market before posting? Only full nodes require the full block chain database (2+ GB now). Lightweight software exists for phones, or you can use a web wallet from places like http://blockchain.info/ or http://instawallet.org/
- jgarzik, bitcoin core dev
Incorrect. Even if you have 100% of the network computing power, you still cannot force core rule changes upon users.
Each P2P node validates transactions and blocks on their own, and refuses to relay invalid ones. Deviating from these rules simply segments yourself away from the rest of the network.
With sufficient network power, you may DoS the network, but not force unwanted rule changes.
- jgarzik, bitcoin core dev
Note that most SATA controllers sold as RAID are really non-RAID hardware + software RAID in the BIOS and Windows driver.
Jeff, the Linux SATA maintainer, and author of several SATA drivers
You don't have a hardware or integrated RAID controller.
What you have is a non-RAID SATA controller, plus software RAID support in BIOS + Windows driver.
This is easiest to see when booting Linux, whose policy it is to only export your hardware, without any fakery.
See Linux SATA RAID FAQ for a clue...
The article refers to IANA, but I think it means ICANN.
The article's author apparently did not read IANA's About page, which states what every Internet geek already knows:
IANA executes policy; it does not create policy. Policy-making is left to working groups within ICANN and elsewhere.
It is easy to look at an individual, and say that costs are lower, especially if you doctor the numbers to assume everyone lives in New York City with high parking rates.
But that is only looking at part of the picture.
A fair comparison would included taxes paid to the city and state, and would include an assessment of what would happen if a majority of individuals started using public transportation for their given locale.
One must include car parking costs for park-and-ride lots, because not everyone can walk to a train station or bus stop.
One must include additional travel time costs, because public transportation is often slower than direct travel via car.
I'm not arguing for, or against, public transportation.
I only ask for a fair comparison.
"when the weather is completely out of control will people start demanding action"
This implies that the weather was... under control at some point in our history?
Our climate models are consistently wrong — either massively under-estimating or massively over-estimating climate change effects.
If we cannot even get the guesswork right, how can we ever hope to "engineer" the most complex, chaotic system in our world?
C++ is the best example of second-system effect since OS/360.