Whoops, I understated the case. Eichorn didn't "just" want to fuck kids. He tried to fuck a kid.

I'm not from here so despite needing to know about all the schools, I don't know that much.

lolol I tried duck.ai and it said "The mascots of schools in Humboldt County, California, vary by district and school. For specific mascots, you would need to check individual school websites or local education resources, as there isn't a comprehensive list available." fuck a duck, duck! no fucking shit! I finally found a clanker more worthless than Gemini! ...Gemini figured out four of them and none are squid, but we do have both lumberjacks (Cal Poly Humboldt) and loggers (Eureka High.) Aha, Lost Coast has a list and no, the most embarrassing mascot is either the Huskies or the Cubs, depending on how you look at it.

They can, because toslink uses a normal LED, and there's lots of shitty toslink "cables" out there, people get them dirty and don't clean them, etc. It's arguably better to use coaxial spdif, but optical is neato. OTOH, no ground loops with optical...

If you've got speakers with ethernet then they've got multiple levels of error correction involved and then the final result depends on the codec and how it's implemented. You could reasonably send audio with ECC which allowed you to reconstruct lost data over spdif, but I don't think I've ever heard of that or anything.

Steal it? First of all, it's not stealing when we send it there. Second, they designed their own superior drones, that's why most people are buying them from them. The time when they had to steal shit was decades ago. Now they are leading in a number of fields.

I have a clue for you, we all know you've got a thing for kids now.

Yes, this is why law enforcement should be required to prosecute known crimes in some kind of sensible order, like starting from the most serious and working down. Don't be fucking with jaywalkers until the wage thieves have been handled.

That's truly not how anything works.

A person in any state without a record can get a semi-automatic weapon in a reasonably short period of time, so practically anybody can be armed legally. Most people can't even afford to feed a fully automatic weapon, so not being allowed to have one is almost purely irrelevant. The same people who can afford the ammo can afford to hide parts and/or guns. While these laws might be objectionable, they don't really have any significant negative effects except on lead distribution-related enjoyment in a couple of states.

I do agree with you, though, about the taxes. I also think the import restrictions are simple protectionism.

Who's asking? They claimed it was what they were going to do.

They didn't do it, so now we know they're liars, and the second amendment isn't worth the paper those fucks' high school diplomas would be printed on if they had them.

You can see this is true because despite their constant claims that downranking their content so fewer people see it is censorship, the same clownfucks who weep those tears love to mod me down to try to stop people from seeing my comments.

It's a lack of self-awareness leading to hypocrisy all the way down. And the number one thing they cannot bear is having someone point out their utter lack of integrity.

The fact you're still using the term TDS which was invented by a convicted pedo only underscores your commitment to supporting child abuse.

That depends on their policies. If they have competent legal counsel (and don't own/rent significant numbers of their own politicians) then those policies will not be only about what to delete when, but also what must be retained.

That's not how anything works either. If you have reason to believe it might be relevant to a court case, you're obligated to retain it. If you have no reason to believe it might be relevant, you're allowed to delete it. What can and can't be proven in court in between these things absolutely matters, but when it's obvious that something is pertinent, then you're obviously not allowed to delete it.

When a person is informed that the cops want to search their device, deleting information from it (including, obviously, tricking them into doing it) is obviously destroying evidence, so we're just having a fun conversation here which isn't relevant to the current discussion at all. It's very clear that what he did was destruction of evidence. I think it's approximately equally clear that he was being pretexted, but he still blundered and will still pay, and the only important takeaway lesson for anyone trying to learn something directly from this story is don't do that.

Yes, this is all terrible fuckery. Yes, in fact the laws are terrible too; making them less terrible wouldn't get someone out of this situation once they got into it, but it might keep them out of it to begin with. But wow, what a foolish thing to plan to do. And that's the problem with even having a device with a delete code — what's the legitimate use of a feature like that? To protect you from industrial espionage? How plausible a threat is that for you? Etc etc.

That's your opinion, My Friend. I think you know what I think that's worth already.

I would not intentionally pay anyone to lie to my face, because I'm not a simpering cuck. I don't know why you love watching the people we are supposed to trust to protect us fuck our freedoms, but it's not my kink, and it's not OK.

I've been ranting about this for quite some years now. The war[s] of the future will be fought with toy technology, and practically all of the toys are made in China. They are well known for their drones. Everyone else is cooked, and had better up their fucking game instead of playing stupid games with no prizes.

I live up in Humboldt. Here we have a pickup with a Trump sticker and a "[M4 outline] Dead Pedophiles Don't Reoffend" sticker on it. I forget if it's a Dodge or a Chevy. Most of the maggots drive American up here, despite our having some of the highest fuel prices in the nation.