With democratic party leaders talking about mexicans as taco eaters, when they thought they were in private, it is always an interesting attacks. then again the same people think we had kings around and needed to have a march to make sure none existed, along with protesting to defund the police, and the remove the jews.

That reminds me of an actual deployment. USAF, our backup generator had a blown regulation system. Our solution was literally that whenever we had to go onto it, we'd station an airman at the generator manually turning the adjustment knobs to keep it at 240V@60Hz.

The conference is aimed at decision makers, which means they spend most of their time researching and then based on some company based formulas they decided the amount of money they are willing to risk on someone else's dream.
that sounds like a perfect job that LLM AIs can easily do. Switch to some system programmed with your companies formulas and let review everything, impartially, and then have that last 40% doing a final review and you can see where he is removing that 60%.

That's a bit like asking a new company with heavy manufacturing infrastructure to turn a cash profit the first year.

The whole idea is that with the base software done, they keep adding the extra features necessary for more people to file, with more and more able to each year.

What was the guys expectations?
He knew it was fake, he knew it was being investigated. Why not transfer millions to various bank in other countries. Transfer it some more, buy a bunch of bitcoins, and take it out as cash. Then get lost. He had access to close to $50 million, even with all transfers and fees for all that he would of been able to do at least $10 million and been able to get to some place relatively safe.

Okay, I think that you're too close to the experience - you made it, why can't others?
Basically, I'm taking more of a statistical approach - in the sense that for each obstacle you put in front of a bunch of students, a percentage will fail. You don't want to give students any more excuses to fail than you can.

I think that I 'm not going to use high school scores as a hiring metric, period. Heck, not even a college degree.

The real question would be whether de-emphasizing homework and weekly testing improves performance or not. "Too much testing" is a refrain I heard a lot a few years ago.

In this case, note how I said "I'd object" not "I object", IE "I would object to"
Basically, race was not mentioned in the article, but I could see somebody trying to use it in the actual system, so I addressed it.

you have not been keeping up with democrat thinking.
things are like learning math, hard work, doing homework, and wanting to learn new things are indicators of a white, rich privilege and mark you as being MAGA. As such anything to make yourself learn in school is an indicator of being white and privileged and under DEI policies there need to be counters to for the people of color.

Indeed. When I started high school, besides the teachers, they had 1 principle, 1 vice, 1 secretary, and 4 counselors who handled things like college applications, technical schools, and such.
When I graduated, they were up to 4 vice principles, 12 counselors, 6 secretaries, and 8 security guards.

I'm well used to exams that will give you a C if you score only a 41 out of 100 from college. Called "grading on a curve", though some classes have been around long enough that they're averaging over multiple classes and multiple years. Then you have tests like the ASVAB, SAT, ACT, etc... They're all curved and otherwise adjusted from raw score to the final.
Depending on the teacher, the curving system can be extremely complex. They can chuck outliers like the student who regularly scores 20 points over everybody else, decide that 10% of the class is getting an A, declare that 80% of the class is getting at least a C, etc...

That said, I'd object to using color of the skin for padding purposes.

Eliminating homework actually makes some sense - in the age of AI, it is too easy to fake much of the time, and is one of the things that tends to separate out the low income types from achieving as well as high income types, because one of the things high incomes enable is time savings. If you have to get a job as a teen to keep your family housed, well, that's less time for homework. If you can afford to be driven everywhere, that's time saved over the bus. If you have to visit the library for internet access, that's extra time needed. Etc...
Same deal could be argued for weekly tests. Performance capability at the end is what matters.
Mind you, I remember my parents talking about the New York Regency tests, which wasn't 100% of the grade, but could replace your grade if you did better on that test than what the teacher awarded.
Had an uncle who hated one of his teachers, and it was mutual. He got an F in the class, which was upgraded to an A because he aced the regency test. Note: This was so rare that he got investigated for possibly cheating, because the test was deliberately harder than the class.

Lost my grandmother to lung cancer that metastasized to the brain. There is some urge towards violence, yes.

Well, in this case rsilvergun is actually right about long prison sentences not deterring crime.
Well, that's the "short" simplified headline, at least.
The more correct statement would be that the deterrence effect of long sentences is minimal compared to the other factors.
It's basically a triangle:
Certainty of punishment: The more certain they are to get caught, the more effect it has.
Immediacy of punishment: The faster the punishment takes place, the more effect it has.
Severity of punishment: The harsher the punishment, the more effect. At least in theory.
What research has shown is that that certainty and immediacy beat severity every single time.
Even the NIJ agrees:
1. The certainty of being caught is a vastly more powerful deterrent than the punishment.
2. Sending an individual convicted of a crime to prison isn’t a very effective way to deter crime.
3. Police deter crime by increasing the perception that criminals will be caught and punished.
4. Increasing the severity of punishment does little to deter crime.
5. There is no proof that the death penalty deters criminals.

I think they're still using faxes for legal purposes even today in Japan.

Seen Youtube lately? I just watched a video on how to make nitroglycerin. Stuff like this has been available for over a decade.

Back in the days that home solar systems still mostly used lead-acid batteries - which in some cases of degradation could be repaired, at least partially, if you had some good strong and reasonably pure sulfuric acid - I viewed a YouTube video on how to make it. (From epsom salts by electrolysis using a flowerpot and some carbon rods from old large dry cells).

For months afterward YouTube "suggested" I'd be interested in videos from a bunch of Islamic religious leaders . (This while people were wondering how Islamic Terrorists were using the Internet to recruit among high-school out-group nerds.)

Software - AI and otherwise - often creates unintended consequences. B-)

That might be a problem if they discover the 2nd phone during the customs inspection.

Some sort of dual-boot phone where you can have it running image 1 when you go through customs and install it and image 2 after a reboot.

And I'm a big fan of misdirection actually. The last thing you want to do is put the phone in a Faraday cage, because that means that you're officially untracked, so they might come looking for you. I'd argue that it would be better to plug it in to charge next to a device playing "sleeping noises", like you're taking a nap, or even just watching TV. Toss a towel or something on top of the phone so the camera isn't useful, or better yet, just a view of the ceiling (with lights from the TV reflecting off as appropriate).

Basically, "expected" information is much better than "no" information. A facebook page showing that you like cats stuffing themselves into small boxes is better than no facebook page at all.