These figures are never indexed to inflation, because that would take away from the hype value.

Avengers Endgame has taken in 2.925 billion worldwide.

However, Gone With the Wind, released in 1939, took in 43.4 billion, if you index the ticket prices to inflation. The average price for an adult movie ticket in 1939 was 25 cents, which is equivalent to $6 today.

So Gone With the Wind is still the all-time champion.

Avengers Endgame is actually number 2.

Here's a quarter, kid.

Buy yourself a real operating system.

If you install Termux on your Android phone or tablet you get a pretty functional terminal/command line.

I use it for for vim and ssh and mutt (email client) and rsync and so on. Even sc-im, which is a very nice spreadsheet.

There's also a way to use Termux to run X11 programs but I've never tried that myself since the phone screen is too damn small.

Old "people" generally live off of their pensions and from money they saved during the years they were working.

They're suppose to pay what they would otherwise have paid to OSS to store their data. So I think the only extra money they're out will be the legal fees. Which isn't nothing but I guess that's the cost of not doing proper and accessible backups.

The article says, "He also ordered Nine PBS to defend and indemnify Iron Mountain should other data be corrupted in the process of retrieving its archival materials."

So the answer to your question appears to be yes.

J.R.R. Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings trilogy (first editions, 1954â"55) â" Among the most valuable modern first editions; still firmly under copyright.

J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter and the Philosopherâ(TM)s Stone (1997 UK first edition) â" Extremely scarce in fine condition and still under copyright worldwide.

Vladimir Nabokov, Lolita (1955) â" A highly collectible first edition that remains under copyright

etc.

They might, eventually.

Future development is a thing. The world went from the Wright brothers first powered flight to a working jet aircraft in just over 35 years.

1. Resource extraction: The moon is rich in resources such as helium-3, which could be used as a clean and abundant energy source on Earth. Extracting these resources would require a permanent lunar base.
2. Scientific research: A permanent base on the moon would provide a stable platform for scientific research, particularly in the fields of astronomy, geology, and physics. The moon's lack of atmosphere and minimal magnetic field make it an ideal location for studying the universe and the Earth-moon system.
3. Space exploration: A lunar base could serve as a stepping stone for future manned missions to Mars and other deep space destinations. It would provide a testing ground for technologies and living conditions required for long-duration space travel.
4. Technology development: A permanent lunar base would spur the development of new technologies, such as advanced life support systems, radiation protection, and lunar mining equipment.
5. Economic growth: The development of a lunar base could stimulate economic growth and create new industries related to space exploration and resource extraction.
6. National security: A permanent lunar base could provide strategic advantages for the nation that establishes it, particularly in terms of space-based surveillance and communication capabilities.

There are probably more if I gave it further thought but this is a start on a list.

I read the headline and thought it was something about screen information and video filtering and thought, why? Since X11 has always been open source.

But I see that it's about twitter and that's something I've never used and have never made any effort to understand.

I guess I'm an old coot...

If I can one-click to print a document why should there be a confirmation dialog when I click the button to reformat my hard drive?

An app store has more permissions and a greater ability to do severe damage to your phone than a checkers game.

Reading the article the judge is saying thing like "make that buttons say Install and not View", and ordering many similar small design details like that.

"I don't like that screen, get rid of it."

So the judge is ordering actual and specific program design.

Anyone who uses Microsoft Windows has no problem with this since that's how it works. Programs magically appear on the menu and/or panel bar, and sometimes disappear again with no user interaction required.

"Who wears glasses while they are having sex?"

Maybe her beauty was blinding.... :-)

I remember a huge outcry around surveillance cameras in stores and the like a few decades ago.

Now everyone seems to accept/ignore the fact that you're being recorded while shopping at Walmart or even just driving down the street.

So is this another flash-in-the-pan surveillance outrage that will fade away just like it apparently did before?

My idea of smart glasses that would actually be useful would be something that would be a personal computer display like you see in some science fiction movies. Wouldn't it be handy to be able to view a "monitor" of any apparent size (tiny and in the corner, or filling your field of view, or...) while you're walking down the street or riding a bus?