The original SWG source leak can be found, like the other guy mentioned, but the swg-source people on github are the most up to date and seem to be adding missing content pieces. Apparently a lot of the SWG source code was used in EQ2...or vice-versa.

Some of the SWG community is toxic, but there are a lot of public servers now based on the leaked code. I take issue with Massively constantly calling them emulators when it is unabashedly the proprietary code...

Pale Moon is sad in comparison to Waterfox.

Even if you disagree with him or think he's a loon, plenty of stuff is being made up to get him deplatformed. Free speech unless the snowflakes disagree with you this day in time, it seems. 'murica.

Chrome, one and done with recaptcha. Firefox/Waterfox, it forces you to do 3-4 proper captchas and takes the sweet time to load new tiles by fading them out and in...

ME has been defeated for some time now.

Waterfox removed that crap...

It's like Firefox before Mozilla started sucking.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmycroft.ai%2F

Yeah, which sucks. People would be more interested if they'd at least provide the xml exports from their tools.

Not to mention licensing in a way that makes people able to afford and/or use the software for open source and free software - part of their analyzer uses clang, the least they could do is actually contribute toward that project and the ones that they "analyze."

It seems like every time they do this for promotion they just claim everything as a "bug" without really individually investigating and reporting all of them, taking only some obviously wrong ones and then lumping the whole report onto the project's bug tracker, if we're lucky.

PVS Studio is a great application but since they only do team licensing "1-9 developers" I can't see the benefit in buying it, just like IDA Pro. I'm an open source only dev in the C/C++/C# world, all my profitable work is in other languages...

I'd gladly pay a REASONABLE price for all these tools if they'd not only provide proper Linux versions (PVS studio only ever had an internal Linux version...in projects with Linux and Windows specific code it is difficult if not impossible to analyze the Linux parts) but so far since it seems like the real benefit to open source teams who can't afford this software (that is windows only anyway, mostly) is extremely low despite it's utility otherwise.

That top comment is what made me stick with pfsense when I rebuilt (virtualized) my router.

Remember he was only operating on what they said, not what they've actually done.

The m0n0wall dev also owned m0n0wall.ch, which does this redirect.

m0n0wall.ch

They have a lot of drama between them, but pfsense still seems superior, especially since as I understand it, the current 2.3 beta is a mostly unpatched FreeBSD, I hear they only have patches on some of the vendor specific drivers....which reminds me I need to file a bug about a crappy broadcom ethernet chip.