Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - Someone read Rama series? Designed actual spacecraft. (livescience.com)

fahrbot-bot writes: Proposed spacecraft could carry up to 2,400 people on a one-way trip to the nearest star system, Alpha Centauri

Engineers have designed a spacecraft that could take up to 2,400 people on a one-way trip to Alpha Centauri, the star system closest to our own. The craft, called Chrysalis, could make the 25 trillion mile (40 trillion kilometer) journey in around 400 years, the engineers say in their project brief, meaning many of its potential passengers would only know life on the craft.

Chrysalis is designed to house several generations of people until it enters the star system, where it could shuttle them to the surface of the planet Proxima Centuri b — an Earth-size exoplanet that is thought to be potentially habitable.

The project won first place in the Project Hyperion Design Competition, a challenge that requires teams to design hypothetical multigenerational ships for interstellar travel.

The ship could theoretically be constructed in 20 to 25 years and retains gravity through constant rotation. The vessel, which would measure 36 miles (58 km) in length, would be constructed like a Russian nesting doll, with several layers encompassing each other around a central core. The layers include communal spaces, farms, gardens, homes, warehouses and other shared facilities, each powered by nuclear fusion reactors.

[My first thought was that someone read Arthur C. Clarke's book, Rendezvous with Rama and used it as a model design.]

Comment Re:LMFAO! (Score 2) 115

If it's a hallucinogenic program then what's the copyright infringement?

The training set is itself presumably typically infringing whether the output is or not.

I personally don't think the output is infringing, but there is a plausible legal argument to be made that it is if the output is similar enough to copyrighted input.

Comment Re:Wrong tool for the job anyway (Score 2) 10

I used to get pretty much all the cheap humble bundles unless I was completely uninterested in them, so I have a moderately sizable steam library, so I know there's plenty of games on steam which would run fine on a chromebook. They are all either old or indie (even vaguely modern versions of Bejeweled will cause the fans to spin up on your GPU at higher resolutions) but there's tons of games which would work fine.

Which then brings us to... there's way more than 99 of them. Probably most of them are visual novel type "games" by now, but those games wouldn't suffer at all for running on a very limited PC. Was someone (google or valve I guess) preventing those games from being used for fear some kid might see hentai on a google device or what?

Comment Re:Thanks Microsoft (Score 1) 59

The last time I had hands on, the video was monochrome and the mouse had one button. For me, even Windows 3.0 seemed miles more intuitive. Plus it had DOS underneath it, and I was quite comfortable with that.

That most likely was MacOS 6, unless it was an even older version. Few people installed 7 on B&W macintoshes, most software at the time would run on either or even ran better on 6 due to the lower resource use. I was familiar with other operating systems and found it to be the least impressive, but once you got used to it, it was pretty usable. My mother was an old school physical pasteup graphic artist, and she got a IIci and Pagemaker and was able to use the system with very little help from me. It came with System 6, and was upgraded to 7. Later I ran netbsd on it.

Slashdot Top Deals

The bigger the theory the better.

Working...