Comment Re:Projection (Score 1) 200
As the specific evidence was regularly mentioned in the press for the last few months, I can only assume you are lying scum.
As the specific evidence was regularly mentioned in the press for the last few months, I can only assume you are lying scum.
What does that have to do with anything? Are you trying to move goalposts in some dishonest move?
Probably because Epstein got him a 13 year old to rape that ended up biting him when he tried. Why are you trying to defend the convicted felon?
Probably.
I do not use Google products, far too crappy. But the last time an LLM "support" bot has failed me was last week.
Indeed. But even NuScale is a bet on mostly hot air. The thing is, the general public, and apparently most "investors" have no clue how long it takes to get complex industrial machinery from the drawing board to "works well in practice". They probably think 5 years would be long. Realistically, if we have a working, proven and economically feasible SMR design in 30 years, that would be surprisingly fast.
You are thinking of the time only engineers and tech-fans were allowed on the Internet. We should never have opened it for the general population. That is killing it now.
On the plus-side, the "engagement" score of "support" will go wayyyy up with all the people cursing this abomination into the deepest hell imaginable. Any engagement is good engagement!
Yes. Second stage: You are not allowed to insult that useless chatbot.
Have you even gotten a single useful answer from these things? My experience is that it rare for them to even only summarize your problem correctly.
Always quoting unhelpful documentation and with no insight into what they are supporting. I wonder whether people can even be incapable and dumb enough to have some benefit from that kind of "support".
Oh, and they are ugly as hell.
This could well be some project by a gifted hobbyist with each one hand-made. I wonder who will buy this. Clearly people with more money than sense, but are there enough of those.
Including personal (!) liability for management and for engineers that act outside of their skills and qualifications. The repetition of the same old tired utterly incompetent IT security mistakes has to stop. As long as there are no consequences for screwing up this extremely, this mess will go on.
Where do you get the "stealing" part from?
Heisenberg may have been here.