Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Destroying Websites? (Score 5, Interesting) 85

As someone who's actively fighting this type of traffic, let me share my perspective.

I have been running a small-ish website with user peaks at around 50 requests per second. Over the last couple of months, my site is getting hit with loads of up to 300 requests per second by these kinds of bots. They're using distributed IPs, and random user agents making it hard to block.

My site has a lot of data and pages to scan, and despite an appropriate robots.txt, these things ignore that and just scan endlessly. My website isn't designed to be for profit, and I do this more or less as a hobby and therefore has trouble handling a nearly 10x increase in traffic. My DNS costs have gone up significantly, with 150 or so million DNS requests being done this month.

The net effect is that my website slows down and gets unresponsive by these scans, and I am looking at spending more money just to manage this excess traffic.

Is it destroying my site? No, not really. But it absolutely increases costs and forces me to spend more money and hours on infrastructure than I would have needed to. These things are hurting smaller communities generating significant cost increases onto those who may have difficulties covering those costs, so calling it bullshit isn't exactly accurate.

Comment Re: It's because of moisture and salt (Score 1) 200

Iceland banned beef spiced with salt & pepper? Because that's the content of the meat. That's how they advertise it, and that's what it is. There's no way they could have gotten away with sneaking in extra preservatives and crap in it for this long, specially with these ridiculous and meaningless "experiments" popping up.

Comment Re:Another possible lesson (Score 1) 168

Secondly because his company managed to deliver several games already, so he is obviously capable of doing so.

Just because a company has released some games doesn't necessarily mean they released *all* the games they've worked on.

But taking a huge lot of peoples money and then run hurts alot more (in reputation) than just taking some publishers', so chances are this game will see the light of day in some form. :)

Comment Re: You keep using that word... (Score 1) 158

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/moot says:

verb (used with object) 4. to present or introduce (any point, subject, project, etc.) for discussion. 5. to reduce or remove the practical significance of; make purely theoretical or academic.

So meaning 4 seems appropriate. Strange that a word simultaneously means to introduce it and to remove it from consideration, but it is a pretty old word I think so it has probably evolved quite a bit.

Origin: before 900; Middle English mot ( e ) meeting, assembly, Old English gemt; cognate with Old Norse mt, Dutch gemoet meeting. See meet1

Sounds like "theory" to me. What's with science and ambiguous words? :)

Comment Why? Here's why! (Score 1) 196

The why is blindingly obvious to me.... Because with the trend of phones being 5"+, a watch is a HUGE lot handier to manage than having to pull out the phone unlock it, read some sms or email which likely doesn't require an immediate response anyway, or hang up a call from someone you don't have time to talk to at the moment. Add to that some other on-a-glance features, like... *the time*, a stopwatch, countdown timer etc, and hey presto, a whole package of quite useful stuff which may come in handy.

Comment Re:OMG! (Score 1) 283

The problem isn't that they got sued. If they hadn't played the patent card things would never have gone out of proportion like this. They should have just sued and said "this phone looks too much like ours" and be done with it. Instead they said "this phone looks like ours" AND included the alleged "theft" of all kinds of things they lie about having invented. The only reason they played the patent card is because if they win, it will put the *entire* smartphone industry years behind because it would mean all their baloney patents would be validated. What better way than to hide it within a obvious case. I'm almost ready to put on a tin foil hat and consider this whole thing a made up plot by Samsung and Apple. Apple builds the smartphones, Samsung builds the components. All competition are ridiculously gimped by idiotic, and because of this obvious "simple case", now legally valid patents. Seems like a good deal for both Apple *and* Samsung in the end, right?

Slashdot Top Deals

"No matter where you go, there you are..." -- Buckaroo Banzai

Working...