A bunch of people I know who work for places like Google, Meta, etc. decided to leave the Bay Area and work remotely when they were a bit older and wanted a cheaper place to raise their family. They all told me that they were happy with where they were in their career and knew that they didn't want to climb the corporate ladder any longer. Those who are so desperate to become a corporate overlord are more than happy to go into the office.

I have Youtube TV and family sharing is still available. Is this a recent change?

I disagree. No amount of healthcare will solve for 30% of people in Alabama being considered obese. Lifestyle contributes way more to health outcomes than access to healthcare. Having said that, we should all have access to healthcare for the times when we get the sort of illness that the healthcare system can deal with.

Serious question. One of the arguments against capital punishment is that the methods are too cruel. What about using something like this?

Maybe private companies should be able to do whatever they want on their own platform and if you don't like it you find another platform. You have freedom of speech, not reach.

If the politician are encouraging, it must be with the consent of a majority of the governed. Otherwise the supervisors would be shown the door, but they are not.

It's about 9.5 per million. As a comparison, Germany is 103 per million and they are being praised for a good response.

Their rate is not great, but here are deaths per 1 million in Europe:

Belgium 801
Spain 613
UK 542
Italy 542
France 434
Sweden 396

Source: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.worldometers.info%2F...

Given the amount of resources that wealthy people have to provide their children, we are no where near a true meritocracy. What we have is better than the old aristocratic social order, but it's not even close to a level playing field. I was at my wife's Yale reunion recently and nearly every one of her classmates children were going to an Ivy League school. Nature? Nuture? Probably a combination, but most will not have as good of a nurture. I recommend the Meritocracy Trap as a good read, but this article is for those who find books too long: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theatlantic.com%2Fma...

That's what happens when you are on the spectrum. You can't evaluate the the hidden agendas that most of us see as clear as day.

They also have a 35% higher per capita death rate than the United States. Go Sweden!

Screw Sabri. Who does he think he is anyway?

Lighten up snowflake. And I'll use bullet points just like you to show how "rational" my argument it. 1. The First Amendment not only guarantees freedom of speech but freedom of association and a company, being a collection of people, has to right to associate or not associate with people based on their ideology as much as a individual citizen. 2. These companies have the weakest monopolies of all because, in the example of Twitter, you can simply start your own platform. But you're not capable of doing that so you sit an whine that "someone has do to something" like you're some SJW petitioning the college administrators over Title IX violations. See it only took me two bullet points so I must be extra rational.

What kind of work requires the cap lock? Tweeting bullshit to own the libs while sitting on the White House toilet at 3:00 a.m.?