Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Simple solution to this (Score 1) 53

0 doesn't make sense because the FCC operates in the US and is headed by the biggest moron in the tech world.
The problem with A is that is that companies that currently invest billions of dollars per year in R&D to develop the standards will stop. They'll wait until someone else does the work and then just implement it. If we took this approach we would still be waiting on LTE, not even dreaming about deploying 5G which has already begun in some areas.
B is a bit more reasonable, but then device makers will be paying the same royalty on a $25 LTE feature phone sold in India compared to a $1100 flagship sold in Orange County. You basically make the royalty a regressive tax on tech by doing this.

Comment Re:Moore's Law (Score 1) 116

I'm not a semiconductor fab expert either, but I do know that some times big jumps like that are counter-intuitively easier.

For example, 10gbps network connections were starting to push the physical limits of a single wavelength on fiber and of the electronics behind the laser and photodiode, 25gbps is about as good as it gets with single wavelength direct detection on-off keying photonics. However, with 100gbps optics (real ones, not LR4 or SR10) it forced the need to use DSPs to generate the transmit and process the receive. The side effect is that suddenly the 100gbps optics have much higher noise and dispersion tolerance than the previous generation of 10gbps stuff. Now you can go out and buy a single wavelength 400gbps optic if you have the need and the budget.

Maybe the move to 7nm fabs will also involve a fundamental change in some other aspect of lithography that makes it much easier than 10nm was.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so." -- Ford Prefect, _Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy_

Working...