This is the real problem - there is very little being produced that warrants the cost and inconveniece of the cinema experience.
If im going to watch another mediocre film im not going to make a special effort thats for sure.

EA does tend to put the same shit out every year with a new timestamp on it.

Will this get me a step closer to the desired idiocracy where I can just veg in a comfy chair and watch Ow My Balls on a massive TV screen that is mostly covered in advertisements?

This Guardian piece leans heavily on the growth of big trees in pristine Amazon patches to paint a picture of resilience, but it’s misleading. Most of the forest is fragmented or deforested, and large areas are now net carbon emitters, not sinks. Highlighting a small subset of intact trees while downplaying widespread degradation risks greenwashing the crisis, giving readers a false sense that the Amazon is largely healthy and climate-positive. Protecting tiny pockets of mature forest does not offset the massive carbon losses from agriculture, fires, and road expansion.

You know its true.

The thing is only about 10 % of what Daily Mail rhetoric labels Illegal "Boat People" are as such, the actual number of illegals is incredibly small - the rest are legitimate asylum seekers coming to this vile racist country out of sheer desperation. I certainly wouldnt come here out of choice.
Dont fall for the propaganda that is shaping UK policy.

Keir Starmer dresses himself up as a safe pair of hands. But his digital ID scheme shows his true face: a weak, authoritarian stooge dancing to the Daily Mail’s tune.

He claims it will stop “boat people.” Nonsense.

The majority crossing the Channel are genuine refugees - Syrians, Afghans, Eritreans with asylum success rates as high as 99%.

Starmer knows this, yet still scapegoats the vulnerable to look “tough.”

What will digital ID really do?

It will turn Britain into a surveillance state where people of colour and migrants are harassed, stopped, and forced to prove their right to exist.

It’s not about security. It’s about institutionalising racism.

Starmer isn’t protecting Britain.

He’s protecting his headlines.

He isn’t standing up to right-wing media.

He’s taking dictation from them.

This isn’t leadership. It’s cowardice.

It exposes Starmer for what he really is: a hollow opportunist willing to trade freedom for fear.

Larry never gave a fuck about Oracle's customers. In fact he made his billions specifically at the expense of the customer base. Why would he suddenly grow a heart now?

Starmer has no interest in controlling actual illegal immigration (the "boat peoples"). He only wants to make the average brit more surveilled.

Another study from the department of the fucking obvious stating something we already know/.
This cost time and money and more importantly action ( lack of )

Engineers want more design and more testing, but management just wants them to push shit out the door now so $$$ can be made.

This is why manufacturers want to make cars this way. They sell it to the public as features, but really they are forced obsolescence and make repairs entirely uneconomical.

It's a bit harder to get others to buy your companies once you've run them into the ground.

You are indeed a Cult member confirmed. In Fauci you trust, yes?

Mask mandates decrease the spread of Covid within the community (they didn't).

The MRNA Covid "vaccine" prevents the spread of Covid (it doesn't).

The MRNA Covid "vaccine" is safe for pregnant women (they didn't actually test it on them).

Hospitals are overrun with Covid patients and have run out of space (mostly wasn't true).

Ivermectin is for horse's and not humans (Ivermectin won the nobel prize for its use in humans).

Closing schools due to Covid is best for children (Covid wasn't a significant threat to children but loss of learning very much was).