Comment Re:The persistent myth (Score 1) 18
You will find an "opinion" that is endlessly repeated in many forums (including right here) that it is impossible to build a fully autonomous driving system unless you are using LIDAR. It isn't true and Tesla has pretty much proved it by this point.
Telsa has precisely zero fully self driving autonomous miles on record. Not even their robotaxis have driven anywhere without a driver, and even in that time they have had many issues.
The fundamental issue with Muskworship is that you can't see the forest through the trees. The point is not that we can't eventually get cars to drive like humans using just vision alone, that is an engineering certainty. The point is that THIS SHOULD NOT BE OUR GOAL. Human drivers fucking suuuuuuck.
As it stands Tesla has the *worst* performing driver assistance systems in torrential rain and heavy fog, situations where LIDAR and RADAR has no problem with. It never ceases to amaze me that people hold up Musk's vision while neglecting to see that he has set the bar for his tech stupidly low. Don't believe me? Ask Naibel Benavides Leon, but you'll need to ask him about his experience with FSD using a Ouija board.
In the meantime some of Tesla's competitors are using LIDAR centrally in their platforms, have millions of self driving miles on record and have a body count of zero.
I wonder how much of Luminar's business plan was based on this myth.
Luminar's primary customer was Volvo and they had an incredibly (LIDAR unrelated) disaster of a launch of their LIDAR included vehicles. They are a victim of another company's fuckup.