I worked for one company where they got rid of the whole engineering team and replaced us with H1B Indians. They had to hire 6 of them to do what I was doing. They even told my manager they couldn't see how I was able to do everything I did. Simple they sucked big green donkey disks! They were so bad the company hired me as a contract for 1 month to clean up the fucking mess they made. They wanted to stay on for another month but I told them they should have never gotten rid of me. I've seen this same thing over and over. No the H1B Indians are not better than the U.S. workers. They are only CHEAPER! And you get what you pay for. So yes remove green card a d while they are at it they should not allow the companies to get any more H1B visa folks for 10 years as punishment for their crimes, yes crimes.

Your mother willingly spread her legs for you daddy the orange man.
Get over him all ready.

Just stop selling to companies building data centers. Oh wait that will cut into their outrageous profits that CEOs need to justify their outrageous salaries.

There is a catch. the Flock Services; doesn't specify to whom. They made it generic on purpose I think. This way in court Flock can argue "it doesn't specify 'provide the Flock Services to the customer". So it could mean to anyone.
It will be interesting how this plays out in court. But I think Flock put in a legal loophole in the TOS.

The products and services is in the and part. The important part is the first part Customer hereby grants to Flock a limited, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, worldwide license to (a) use and disclose Customer Data to provide the Flock Services;.

Flock now claims a perpetual right to use the data those cameras collect. Not for the length of the contract. Indefinitely. A town can cancel Flock next week, lose access to its own footage, and Flock keeps the right to use that data anyway.

Set aside how you feel about the cameras, that argument is already happening everywhere else, and it's not the part that should interest anyone who signs vendor contracts for a living. The lesson here is simpler: a customer's own data-retention policy is worth little if the vendor's terms say otherwise. The retention policy is real right up until it meets the terms of service â" and then the terms win.

The lesson here is simpler: a customer's own data-retention policy is worth little if the vendor's terms say otherwise. The retention policy is real right up until it meets the terms of service â" and then the terms win.

And the terms aren't the only thing that moves. This is the same Flock that, Wired reported this week, has been building tools to identify and track people by their movements â" the exact capability it spent years telling city councils it didn't do. So the promise drifts and the contract drifts, both in the vendor's direction, and the customer learns about it after the fact, if at all.

References the perpetual, worldwide license.

See: 4.1. Customer Data.
"Customer hereby grants to Flock a limited, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, worldwide license to (a) use and disclose Customer Data to provide the Flock Services; and (b) use Customer Data to support and improve Flockâ(TM)s products and services."

Last Updated: August 21, 2026
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.flocksafety.com%2Fle...

Take a look at US Mobile. That is where I'm Moving to from T-Mobile already. T-Mobile has FUCKED its customers and all former Sprint customers repeatedly.

Tell my why Biden didn't release the files when he had them. I'll tell you why NO ONE is releasing them. To many powerful peoples names are in them and don't want their names released. I'm sure JFK threats have been made to stop the releases. So it's not just Dumpy Trump it was also bumbling Biden. And will continue with whomever else takes office.

This makes the 6th data breach they have had. Why anyone would still be using them is a total mystery to me!

There are roughly five -publicly- disclosed security incidents (how many not publicly disclosed?):
2011
2015 - one of the two of the worst
2016
2017
2022 - 2023 - the worst


Now you can add 2026 to the list

100000% Correct!

They removed it because "Do everything evil" Google told them to. Google wants their adds crammed down your throat. The solution, uninstall Chrome.

100%

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnbc.com%2F2026%2F06%2F0...

I dealt with the Kurds during "Operation Provide comfort" during the second gulf war. They were the RUDEST people I have ever met in my life! It's no wonder no Arab state wants them.Kind of like the Palestinians - no Arab state wants them either.

That's all Holltywood is good at anymore - remakes. They can't come up with anything original that is any good, so they just REMAKE all the old stuff that was good and fuck it all up. Hollywood is done, stick a fork in it.

Every judge in the last 10 years has been making political judgments. Doesn't matter which political affiliation. It's all about how do they screw they person or people they are ruling against.