all you people cant tell if slaughtering 30,000 of your own people is good or bad?
So... Should we attack every country that slaughters its own people?
couldn't hurt.
What? You're not going to advocate for it??? I thought you were invoking some kind of principle or something.
You're down with Russia killing far more Ukrainians, whom they claim are their own people?
You're down with what China's doing to the Uyghurs, whom they claim are their own people?
And while we're on the topic, how many Iranians should we be willing to kill to save them from their leaders? Nuclear extermination would surely do it... do you advocate that?
But maybe it won't take that much. Regime change in Afghanistan only cost 2000 American lives, 175,000 Afghan lives, and 2,000,000,000,000 dollars, but we sure got rid of those sorry... What? They're back in power?
Only the simplest minds think intervention automagically yields the intended result. In fact the current sorry situation in Iran is a direct result of us trying to "fix" things more to our liking in the middle of last century.
all you people cant tell if slaughtering 30,000 of your own people is good or bad?
So... Should we attack every country that slaughters its own people?
If it does happen, it will do nothing but turn the 3D printer hobby market into a market similar to the "get free movies/TV/sports on this magic streaming stick" market. I built a CNC stepper controller from discrete components connected to a DOS computer in the 90's. I wrote my own limited CAM software, too. Things have only gotten easier since then.
I thought the goal was to reduce hallucinations.
No, they want to "correct" it to harbor only mainstream hallucinations.
"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain." -- The Wizard Of Oz