That's not a dig on things like the POSIX API, BTW. I mean EMACS was called "Eight Megabytes And Constantly Swapping", because the systems were fractions of the power we have now. (I just did a little mandelbrot set program in Go and C, just to check. They were almost identical in performance, but the C executable was 20KB and the Go one was 2.4MB.)
We can afford sprawling APIs with lots of little nooks now. And that means a big namespace.
We got it a couple years back and I refused any information beyond what the regular census requires. I got a phone call where I explained I didn't trust them to secure my information. So far, I haven't been prosecuted for it, nor have I heard back from them. Came down to it, I'd be okay with being the test case.
Steam is quite dirty to install though... No source, 32-bit only (same for the games), some UI bugs, etc.
Ah, an AC. No, the games can be 64-bit, I run The Talos Principle that way, for example. As to source, for operating systems and utilities and most software, I want source. Games are an area where open-source doesn't work quite as well. I'm fine with closed-source and actually paying money for games. If you want to be a purist, you go on with your bad self.
And for what's left, you have to sort the real and well-made native or ported games, from the clunky ports by people who are not GNU/Linux developers...
Not so far. They've all worked just fine. If I measure, there's a framerate drop on some games between Windows and Linux, but up to this point not so's it bothers me in actual gameplay. Of course, I have an Nvidia card. People with AMD have some legit issues there, but I bought my hardware with Linux in mind.
There have been at least two Windows 7 updates I've had to temporarily disable Grub for, otherwise they fail.
More games than I can handle, really. All full Linux ports. I do have Windows, but haven't booted it to play games in at least a couple months now.
>Do you believe rehabilitation is impossible or do you want revenge?
I don't believe that someone who commits mass murder can be rehabilitated, no. It isn't about revenge; it's about public safety.
Someone once pointed out that hoping a rapist gets raped in prison isn't a victory for his victim(s), because it somehow gives him what he had coming to him, but it's actually a victory for rape and violence. I wish I could remember who said that, because they are right. The score doesn't go Rapist: 1 World: 1. It goes Rape: 2.
What this man did is unspeakable, and he absolutely deserves to spend the rest of his life in prison. If he needs to be kept away from other prisoners as a safety issue, there are ways to do that without keeping him in solitary confinement, which has been shown conclusively to be profoundly cruel and harmful.
Putting him in solitary confinement, as a punitive measure, is not a victory for the good people in the world. It's a victory for inhumane treatment of human beings. This ruling is, in my opinion, very good and very strong for human rights, *precisely* because it was brought by such a despicable and horrible person. It affirms that all of us have basic human rights, even the absolute worst of us on this planet.
This is precisely why I lost all interest in Oculus the instant I heard that it had been acquired by Facebook.
"Ada is PL/I trying to be Smalltalk. -- Codoso diBlini