Can anybody explain? So we can use the plagiarizing genAI backend to generate software, then we label it as GPL,
Can a person apply a license to code they don't have the copyright to? The answer is no. This code is either infected with a mishmash of copyright from its original sources, or it's not copyrightable at all, and courts haven't decided which but they are both bad.
San Francisco has good mass transit
It has basically functional mass transit, but last time I lived there my commute was 15 minutes by car or 1 hour and 15 minutes by two buses linked by subway. I could probably have walked faster. Now I would dread parking in either neighborhood but then it was feasible.
This is an incredibly short sighted argument for someone calling someone else short sighted. Someone might need updates while evacuating, and their car's radio will have better reception than the portable they are using inside of the car. AM radios work OK inside of cars, but still not as well as a car stereo using the external antenna. It's easier to use and hear while driving. It's a small addition to the cost. Yes, people should have a portable radio for emergencies. Having the car stereo pick up the AM broadcasts is still also useful in emergencies.
It's 2026, and everyone already carries a high bandwidth digital radio with them. It's called a cell phone.
In a real emergency, it is usually worthless, unless maybe it has an FM radio receiver. FM isn't worthless in an incident, it's just not as useful as AM.
AM is good for sending out information during a disaster which includes power outage, when the cellular network will crater whether it's affected by the outages or not. And it will be, because some sites' generators won't work, or they don't have much fuel to begin with. Everyone can have solar and hand crank generators for their phones and still have them be worthless.
Classic Slopdot, I got modded down for my comment while he's using Claude to "write" the code.
What does "Teams" actually do? I've never used it, so it's always been a puzzle, as every article seems to just assume that I know. I gather it does something that facilitates, or is supposed to facilitate, different people on different computers working on the same project, and that's as far as I get. Perhaps there *is* no open-source equivalent.
This isn't good evidence, but that there should be edge cases where they don't act the same should be expected. (OTOH, I've no experience with either product.)
and is secure because it doesn't rely on a JIT compiler
Is this what Claude told you to put in your comment?
You've failed to understand the concept of a secure enclave.
He said, while failing to understand that it's for controlling our use of our computers. Eyeroll all day.
If the user has no control over it, then it's for the control of the user.
The idea as presented as being in the user's benefit is that the user can control it, but applications cannot.
Is it holding it between the index and middle fingers? "Got your gene! I got your gene!"
This version has a dumber headline, so it's like a whole new story! Three people didn't like it!
which eventually led to a vehicle search and charges of possessing drugs with intent to distribute
Yeah that's some old shit. Anyone look at the case enough to know what the evidence was? Was it just quantity or was it packaged?
America had a republic until Lincolns' War of Northern Aggression.
Oh look, it's the hipster maggot come along to tell us all how great slavery was.
If one spends a lot of money on something, it is kind of save to assume he has done his math.
No, it's reasonable. It's not safe.
The other part of that is that you're not necessarily doing the same equation, they may be solving for something something different.
Computer Science is the only discipline in which we view adding a new wing to a building as being maintenance -- Jim Horning
