Its in the title.

Neither the FBI's assessment nor the CDC's assessment agree with your recommendations. They have a lot of heavily-researched recommendations filled with rigorous citations and backed by tragic data.

Research over the past 30 years is clear on how to do it: First and foremost, socioeconomic disparity needs to be addressed. Second, availability of mental health care to minors, especially by decoupling it from parental employment, or said differently, universal mental health care for minors at the very least. Third, external groups auditing schools for signs of bullying, social classes or have/have-nots, especially by administrators and teachers; data shows schools and districts cannot self-assess because the ones doing the assessments are part of the bias, and typically blind to their actions.

The data shows, and the FBI summary is clear in describing, that regulations on firearms themselves are statistically irrelevant. In fact, the FBI summary explicitly calls out that is one of the biggest pieces of misinformation and false claims, the demonstrably wrong belief that easy access to weapons is the most significant risk factor. The data shows it has virtually no effect whatsoever. Anyone wanting to commit violence at school can do so.

The four-prong assessment model, looking at the personality of the student, the family dynamics, the school dynamics, and interplay/leakage between any of those with society at large, tends to give the best view of risks. Schools and local officials especially tend to downplay their role, dismissing teacher favoritism to cliques as "school spirit", "supporting the team", and similar, and dismissing their prejudice because they are blind to it, believing it justified.

Unfortunately the research-backed guidance isn't popular with lawmakers. The plans cost money. Addressing the disparity is labeled terms like "woke" and "communist". Universal healthcare labeled "socialized medicine" and given labels like "death panels" as though insurance companies don't do the same today. The republican party is against it claiming individual liberties, the democratic party is against it due to high costs.

Dont come running to me if you are choosing an operating system or software stack from a vendor ( microsoft ) where security and protection are not a standard part of the operating system and must be paid for an additional fee. That means its insecure by design.

This civilisation has a 5% chance of changing trajectory to one which doesnt lead to our extinction. This absurd idea is just one of many ill conceived ideas that serve to strengthen this assertion.

I think Clementine was my favorite, for it showed not just his imagination and humor, but his skill.

Pictures or it didnt happen

I have a hand with finger muscles that is also able to operate a computer.

Keir Starmer is perhaps one of the most rancid politicians this nation has ever known.
BlueLabour = Red Tory

There exists concrete products already that are carbon negative.
Hempcrete and Limecrete.

You and the AI are both wrong.

Worse that its solution is wrong, and therefore a total waste of resources.
Hempcrete and Limecrete are carbon negative ... ie waaaay better than 35% and these products are already commercially available.

We are "Led by donkeys"

Unfortunately not

Hempcrete exists and is carbon NEGATIVE.

That the AI didnt suggest this proves your assertion that AI is going to save us is wholly incorrect

In all honesty though that the AI didnt suggest either Hempcrete or Limecrete which are commercially available and CO2 negative tells us either that the AI is unfit for purpose or for some reason these products were deliberately excluded. It tells us that those who enlisted the services of the AI have been promoted to a high level of incompetence.

There is no reason to think we are not still on the path to extinction.

The AI is still faulty.

Limecrete and Hempcrete exist and are far better than 35 % , they are carbon NEGATIVE!!!!.

Why did the AI not suggest this ?

We continue to stay on the path to extinction.

Hempcrete is carbon negative.
If the AI doesnt reccommend this , then the AI is defective.

Once again more bullshit and #greenwash from the worlds billionaire cretins.

Heres a few citations in case you think im a loon.
( Im not ! thats the idiocracy )

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fp...

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fp...

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F...

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.anthropocenemagazi...

America Yeah , such a great place.

Offsetting this way just moves the problem somewhere else - it doesnt go away.