Stalking laws tend to cover surveilling someone without their consent. If they can claim they have cause to follow me home, I can claim they’re being malicious and threatening doing so. Followingme home with the implicit threat of sending armed government employees after me is threatening.
Or they live in the neighborhood, or took transit to the store. Maybe they rode a bicycle.
In any case, if I’ve done nothing wrong and your drone follows me off your property I’m filing stalking and maybe doxxing complaints against your security guard, your store, your store’s manager, and Flock.
It was coming right for me. I feared for my safety.
Failed, exploding-cost projects like this are a good reason to consider whether replacing your legacy stack is worth the risk and expense.
It’s still a bot accessing content requested not to be accessed by bots. It’s alsonot identifyingitself as a bot.
I'd be happier with an OLED screen that was capable of displaying text that wasn't a blurry mess.
No, I'm in DFW. Houston I think is the 4th largest city. But DFW is the 4th largest metropolitan statistical area. Houston/Woodlands/Sugarland area is 5th.
There are some places around that can get symmetrical fiber, but my area of Arlington isn't one of them.
Supposedly the city signed a deal to roll out fiber to the whole city, but it's been something like 3 years since the "groundbreaking" and I haven't heard a peep of an update from the city, or the company they are working with to do the rollout.
Best I can get is Spectrum 1Gb down/40Mb up for $95. The download is fine but the slow upload speeds are driving me nuts, and of course the price is pretty bad considering what other areas can get for cheaper.
Hell, my friend has a cabin in Arkansas, about 45min north of Hot Springs. Absolutely the middle of nowhere. It's about a 30 min drive to the nearest gas station. But he can get symmetrical gig fiber for quite a bit less than what I'm paying.
As soon as such a thing is available to me, I'll sign up. Alas, there is no such service available to me despite living in the 50th most populous city in the country, in the middle of the fourth most populous metropolitan area in the US.
Something. something, lack of competition...
Some of the most useful drivers in CUPS are "Generic PCL Laser Printer" and "Generic PostScriptPrinter". The Canon drivers for my ImageClass MF8580Cdw offer some extra features, but both of those drivers work with it and many other printers if you're just concerned with printing. It will also work over lpd, HP's hpjis or whatever, HTTP, or HTTPS. I used to have (and probably still do in a drawer) a standalone network print server to hook up to non-network-native printers. For that I could use PCL or PostScript generic drivers depending on the printer, too. Or I could actually FTP a text, PS, EPS, PCL, or IIRC PDF file directly to the print server.
Not everything useful is your primary desktop.
At this point an iPhone 5s is both cheaper and easier to order than a RaspberryPi 4B. People have lots of uses for those, which is why they're sold out everywhere that's not scalping or price gouging.
I imagine you'd usually, outside a massive backbone, terminate these into passive optical mux/demux equipment before it ever got near electronic routers or switches.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.precisionot.com%2Fmu...
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencedirect.com%2F...
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lumentum.com%2Fen%2Fop...
That appears to be a cable of 20 fiber pairs, with each fiber in each pair still having a single core.
You'd really just need your gateway router to do NAT for you. We could reserve a
Why would that traffic get past the router? Why wouldn't that be internal traffic, and tunneled if it needs to go over the Internet?
In order to dial out, it is necessary to broaden one's dimension.
