Red herring much?

Trump's friends are not buying all of TikTok. They are only (allegedly) getting control of TikTok operations in the U.S.
So Indonesia's disruptions of TikTok operating has nothing to do with Trump and Co. Literally a different TikTok at that point.

If that deal actually happens (will believe it when I see TikTok themselves announce it officially), it's only the U.S. operations they are buying.
So it will be kinda like how TikTok is a completely different and separate app in China itself. TikTok, USA will be not be the same as TikTok, SEA.

Sorry, I didn't write that last sentence very clearly. I wasn't saying I felt it was too late, I meant summit participant's intention to take action to avert disaster is very much a thing of the past. Years of having the fossil-fuel industry involved with it has seen to that. The governments of the world are overwhelmingly headed by people who don't want to change their lifestyle for the benefit of people they will never meet.

We've seen how much meaningful progress they have made in the last decade of the meetings.

Nowadays this summit is just poor countries trying to extract "reparations" from richer ones some the climate change is impacting then more and environmental concerns mean they can't have the same period of industrial growth others did a hundred years ago. China and Western nations pulling up the ladder behind them on a nation-building scale.

The idea of taking action to mitigate a disaster is long past.

Sounds like a bold prediction to make in 2025.

Wait, do I need to trash my 13600k and build a new system with an Intel Core Ultra for it to be compatible?

"Only the finest-quality unwanted shit will be smeared on your fridge door."

The exploit chain does not cost millions of dollars to execute. It's simply the cost to buy the information from the right people. That's like spending four figures for a set of build plans for a coffee table, making the table, and then claiming the coffee table is worth thousands of dollars.

Information can be leaked or "rediscovered" by anyone not trying to run a spyware business and lower that barrier to entry significantly.

We all live on the same planet. Shifting your carbon footprint to someone else's numbers where they don't have any legally-binding limit doesn't solve anything.

I like how you phrase this like Jellyfin has been around as long as Plex, and is as mature in its development. For many people, Jellyfin wasn't really "there" until version 10.9 -- and that was less than two years ago. Many people had Plex servers up and long established before then, and see no reason to change after investing lots of time in their existing setup. The main complaints driving people to Jellyfin now are:

1) The addition of advertising-supported streaming content.
2) The recent push to make the ecosystem into some lame social media network revolving around TV/movies.
3) The most recent changes to pricing and remote access no longer being free.

  - You can disable the first one at the account-level very easily.
  - You can also hide/disable the effects of the second and set privacy settings to tamp it down.
  - And for anyone who already had a Lifetime Plex Pass, the third is a non-issue.

Considering how much longer Mr Zuckerberg has been in the professional world, being associated with an asshole like Mark Zuckerberg of Meta has probably hurt his reputation.

if they discontinue the product and then bring it back when the news cycle has sufficiently buried it, then they can claim it's a new product and their shareholders will see how innovative they are.

I hope this means they will "reinvent" the K740 since I can't find anyone else making a backlit scissor-mechanism low profile keyboards. The Cherry Stream would be my most likely replacement if it had backlighting.

Making grandiose fear-inducing statements on what is essentially business contact negotiations is the real wtf here.

If this was happening in the U.S. I would wonder if Tesco was trying to bait some Executive Branch assistance from a certain administration.

There are three Kroger-group stores in my city, two Walmarts, a Target, Hy-Vee, one other grocery chain, two different natural foods-focused stores, and that doesn't even count the convenience stores that sell milk too. This is all in a 100,000 population city.

Plenty of places to get milk. A city half this size should be able to support three choices easily. There are smaller towns around me and some of them might be more limited on grocers, but they are also close enough their residents drive here often for retail reasons.

If that much of the food supply is concentrated into the hands of a single corporation, that sounds like a monopoly that needs to be broken up in the name of national security.