Journal dubiousdave's Journal: fargin' slashbot groupthink 20
The . has a story about cool science, specifically about the science I've previously been involved in, and the whole fucking thing turns into the tried-and-true anti-US-oil-is-evil ignorant flamefest. I know it's just business as usual, but I used to work on the old ship, so it pisses me off that these idiots are ranting about how ODP is destroying the world to make oil companies rich.
I don't think even 5 people actually bothered to read the article or, for that matter, all of the blurb before spouting.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:hint (Score:2)
Don't do it, HBI; they're not worth it. ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
Correct me if I'm wrong (Score:2)
I know there have been some issues with cutting canals in the Missippi Delta marshlands but that isn't necessarily directly linked to offshore fields (most of them were cut for inshore exploration and wells IIRC)
My feeling on this is no matter how "radical" an environmentalist you are we are going to need oil and gas for some time to come. It is a good thing to be able to economicly e
Re:Correct me if I'm wrong (Score:2)
But to your question, yes, I think the Gulf has been pretty clean for quite a while. When I was growing up, a trip to the beach meant tarballs on your feet, almost with
Re:Correct me if I'm wrong (Score:2)
The need for oil certainly won't - but hybrids help reduce gas consumption, while switching to liquified natural gas would eliminate the car's dependence on oil for fuel. Switch electricity production over to a mix of natural gas and fission as well, and IIRC the US wouldn't have to import a single drop of oil from outside North America, let alone from OPEC!
One of the areas
Re:Correct me if I'm wrong (Score:2)
I believe that currently over 50% of the North American supply comes from coal, the remainder is a mix of natural gas, nuclear, and hydro. Not much o
Re:Correct me if I'm wrong (Score:2)
I believe there are some places where natural gas is vented and burned from oil wells as a nuisance. NG is usually found in oil wells, unless I'm mistaken.
Re:Correct me if I'm wrong (Score:2)
You're right - 53% coal, 21% nuclear, 16% natural gas, 7% hydroelectric and just 3% from oil, down from 5% in 1988. Cutting out that 3% would probably cut quite a chunk out of the c. 30% of oil consumption I'd want to replace, but vehicles take account for 45% - a much better target for reductions.
I do think we need to thin
Re:Correct me if I'm wrong (Score:2)
Ack! I'll confess to having made the typical slashbot error and jumped to conclusions without having read the article.
I just heard "deepwater drilling" and assumed it ha
Re:Correct me if I'm wrong (Score:1)
I wasnt involved with the core guys, but did hang out with some of the microfossil guys who would do stratigraphic analysis/ isotope ratio studies with the core data. Interesting stuff.
Similar studies are done by the oil industry for their exploration, but this project, as you said, has nothing to do with it.
idiots!
Re:Correct me if I'm wrong (Score:2)
Re:Correct me if I'm wrong (Score:1)
Spent most of my time in the "hard rock" section.
Re:Correct me if I'm wrong (Score:2)
Re:Correct me if I'm wrong (Score:1)
When I was there it was LDGO
Know anyone from Rutgers?
Re:Correct me if I'm wrong (Score:2)
Sorry, I was really sad to see, (Score:2)
Re:Sorry, I was really sad to see, (Score:2)
Em whined about my last .sig :
so I changed it.
Ok, RTFA (Score:2)
Seems like a pretty cool geophysical reasearch program with the potential to answer a whole lot of important earth science questions.
Re:Ok, RTFA (Score:2)