A newspaper's job is to give you facts
You may think so, but the value goes the other way. A newspaper does not exist to give *you* value - it exists to give value to its owners. Monetary, politically, and/or otherwise.
And the only guy who seems to give a shit about free speech anymore.
Oh, shut the fuck up.
Oh the sweet irony...
The note drew 16 thumbs down emoji, 11 wastebasket emoji, six clown emoji, two face palm emoji and two poop emoji, according to screenshots of the Slack conversation...
This is what news reporting is turning into. Emoji stats.
Yay!
If I want to post something and do it on Meta services, where do I post
If it is not obvious where to post then perhaps you needn't post at all?
Indeed, but that was already implied in "Meta".
If I go to my computer store, buy office 365
It's been a while since you tried, hasn't it?
There's no way it is *better* than a human at understanding human requests.
I wouldn't be so quick to underestimate the worth stored in the models. The tricky part is getting it out in a useful form.
If we allow for the loose use of "understand" in the context of LLM:s etc, I would say that one model understands and combines fragments of knowledge, behavior and expectations of millions, perhaps billions of humans. I couldn't possibly match that. My best bet is to have cultural, technical, organizational and domain knowledge that covers enough of the task at hand.
Not sure about your examples... How much paper do you see in offices (except in bathrooms, and I hope we get to keep it there until I learn how to use the three shells) nowadays compared to 25 years ago?
On the contrary, I believe. The trained LLM:s generally have material and capacity to derive better than a programmer what a customer actually means and what is implied in the loose requirements.
What is missing is having the algorithms actually asking the customers to fill in the blanks or ambiguities instead of hallucinating or "guessing".
give a AI a set of values
Who gets to decide those values?
In the US you are expected to pay the "advertised" price.
No, they are conditioned to pay *more* than the advertised price. A $10 bill will not suffice to pay a $9.99 latte.
It seems that you misunderstand me. I responded to a post that said that the resource requirements of Java were a rational compromise for the availability of developers in $LANGUAGE, by showing a reasonable alternative.
I have used Java since 1.0 and still do, so no hate from this direction. I also do not hate
C# developers are about as abundant as Java developers, I would say. And in my experience C# tends to have a smaller resource footprint, making it cheaper in cloud hosting.
"Believe me, Canada is crap. I went there once. Actually after 1/100 of the way it already felt crap, so I turned around."
It was a bumpy read but I think it was worthwhile, perhaps because of the bumps that provided some material for discussion and criticism.
So they want to take the information that the data hoarders get anyway when you use their connected services, package it all up in a bundle, and give you some money for selling it to everyone else (or the same hoarders in case they get some additional data that they don't already have).
"There's a little bit of your soul that you may not have sold to the devil yet, but we can help you with that."
The devil finds work for idle circuits to do.
