
Being human, some computer scientists and economists probably do make unwarranted assumptions. But the fact that humans can alter the rules of the game might not be relevant here: if there is an underlying meta-game whose rules constrain how the rules can be altered, then that is the model who's Nash equilibrium is sought. It seems, to me, unlikely that this will be an infinite regress: humans are ultimately restricted by the laws of physics. Even though any model of that meta-game would probably to too complex to be represented as any arrangement of all the subatomic particles in a human brain, it would be interesting if it were possible to characterize any of its properties mathematically.
If OpenOffice is "open", then why does a preview need to be a "sneak" preview? That term should be used for a review of something that has been developed behind closed doors, that we are only now being given a brief glimpse of...
Hold on to the root.