Comment Re: In the future, there will be mech soldiers ! (Score 1) 20
Live your life in such a way that you get banned from Faceboot
Live your life in such a way that you get banned from Faceboot
What they mean is minimum acceptable value for customers, which means maximum possible profit for owners
The USSR was just another oligarchy. They had privileged people at the top and everyone else was below them. That's not communism. You might argue that communism is impossible, but the obvious retort is that capitalism is unsustainable and leads to plutocracy, which is just a specific kind of oligarchy.
Therefore what we can really conclude is not that communism or even capitalism is itself the problem, it's tolerating inequality.
People don't go to Wendy's though. I mean I do, and some people do, but it's consistently not busy. Which is weird because IMO it is better than Mickey Deez, and it's certainly cheaper, or at least has cheaper options. People want what they are used to, and they are less used to Wendy's.
Because it's not reality and because the technology is fundamentally unsuited to the job. Industrial control should be predictable.
You have to be able to read, then read the thread, for what I wrote to make sense. Work on that.
I agree on it being hard to understand the inner workings of LLMs but I'm not speaking to that part here, only about improving their function in some way which might be as consequential as transformers, which did not require that level of understanding. OTOH any such development will probably require more training and more processing time to run the result, so there are multiple constraints.
and markedly less helpful in practice if there's a "do not perturb the nanites in your clothing if you want them to not migrate into your cells and start mitigating the harmful effects of your DNA" user notice on the treated article
When I read TFS I immediately thought of ScotchGard.
Goes TDS
Trump's a Dick Sucker! Did he suck off a CEO, a horse, or an ex-president?
I read the Ars interview with one of the guys who worked on this, and he justified it by saying that for broad appeal they need to have a modern looking UI.
Remember when Firefox supported themes? Back when they cared what we wanted?
However, it seems that automakers are too stupid to understand this, except Tesla
HJAHAhaHAHHAhaHhAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAH
which is why nobody but Tesla wants FSD
AHAHHAHAHHAHAHAH
My only question is, are you this stupid, or do you think we're this stupid?
We all used to think it had to be intelligent to be dangerous. Turns out all it needs is just to be more complicated.
The weirdest thing about this comment is that you think they don't have supermarkets in Europe.
He had a right to donate money anywhere he wanted and people had a right to feel any way they wanted about it and act accordingly. No one interfered with his rights. They come with responsibilities. One of those is responsibility for your actions.
Mozilla and Firefox were a joke long before he left so that's clearly not the reason.
You support "palestine"
Wrong. I oppose genocide and there's no need for quotation marks there since it clearly is one.
you're all in on Iran
I'm all in on the problems with Iran being literally caused by our doing a coup there, and creating more martyrs there not being the way to solve them.
And Israel is your #1 enemy
No, the orange child rapist is my #1 enemy. He wanted bibi to hurry his genocide up, so he's a big part of the problem there too.
You hate Christians
I hate all religion, which is all for controlling people, which Christians love to do — but they hate to walk their talk.
We're here to give you a computer, not a religion. - attributed to Bob Pariseau, at the introduction of the Amiga