There's also the fact that in software engineering you get WAY more recognition for developing a new package that gets adopted than for patching old stuff. So even though a lot of perceived issues around security or multimonitor support or whatever could have been fixed in X with some effort, there was a lot of institutional pressure at RedHat etc. to make sure X died so Wayland would succeed.
Another way of putting it is justifying your job because you have a mature product.
It is like the joke about Braille keys on a drive up ATM.
I've seen people pull forward so people in the back seat can use an ATM. I've also seen people hop out of the far seat and use them. The latter is more difficult, but both are doable by blind people, so this falls into a candidate for the Ig Nobel Prize.
The reductions extend beyond typical cost-cutting measures and coincide with record corporate profits at the end of last year.
Anybody else see this statement as being complete BS?
The world is no nursery. - Sigmund Freud